A. Bayne, Elizabeth A. Mumford, Caroline Lancaster, Jackie Sheridan-Johnson
{"title":"DIGITAL DANGERS: TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED ABUSE AMONG ADULTS AGE 50+","authors":"A. Bayne, Elizabeth A. Mumford, Caroline Lancaster, Jackie Sheridan-Johnson","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.0867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Older adults (age 50+ years) are adopting new technologies to increase their independence, prevent social isolation, and help them to age in place. However, digitalization introduces new risks for technology-facilitated abuse (TFA). TFA is any form of online abuse including threats, identity theft, financial fraud, among other forms of victimization. Limited research has explored TFA in general population samples among older adults in the U.S. With support from the U.S. Department of Justice, NORC at the University of Chicago conducted a survey of TFA experiences in a nationally representative sample of n=1,011 U.S. adults aged 50 years and older. Latent class analyses were applied to understand the pattern of older adults’ exposure to ten different forms of TFA, resulting in three classes distinguished by the number of different forms of TFA experienced. This session describes findings from the study, such as socio-economic characteristics associated with TFA profiles, the respondents’ relationship to the perpetrator, behaviors taken in response to TFA, and resulting harms. Among key findings are that six in 10 community-dwelling adults age 50+ have experienced at least one form of TFA in their lifetime. The most common forms of TFA experienced were financial abuses and identity theft. Different demographic groups of older adults experienced different victimization patterns. For example, those who identify as LGBQA were at a much higher risk of experiencing TFA. This session concludes with research and education opportunities for preventing TFA across multiple levels among older adults.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"470 1","pages":"260 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Older adults (age 50+ years) are adopting new technologies to increase their independence, prevent social isolation, and help them to age in place. However, digitalization introduces new risks for technology-facilitated abuse (TFA). TFA is any form of online abuse including threats, identity theft, financial fraud, among other forms of victimization. Limited research has explored TFA in general population samples among older adults in the U.S. With support from the U.S. Department of Justice, NORC at the University of Chicago conducted a survey of TFA experiences in a nationally representative sample of n=1,011 U.S. adults aged 50 years and older. Latent class analyses were applied to understand the pattern of older adults’ exposure to ten different forms of TFA, resulting in three classes distinguished by the number of different forms of TFA experienced. This session describes findings from the study, such as socio-economic characteristics associated with TFA profiles, the respondents’ relationship to the perpetrator, behaviors taken in response to TFA, and resulting harms. Among key findings are that six in 10 community-dwelling adults age 50+ have experienced at least one form of TFA in their lifetime. The most common forms of TFA experienced were financial abuses and identity theft. Different demographic groups of older adults experienced different victimization patterns. For example, those who identify as LGBQA were at a much higher risk of experiencing TFA. This session concludes with research and education opportunities for preventing TFA across multiple levels among older adults.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.