M. Taani, Yura Lee, Julie Ellis, Chi Cho, Ammar Hammouri
{"title":"SOCIAL PARTICIPATION, LONELINESS, AND CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS OF MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER ADULTS IN TAIWAN","authors":"M. Taani, Yura Lee, Julie Ellis, Chi Cho, Ammar Hammouri","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.2735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Loneliness among middle-aged and older adults is a growing public health concern in the aging society. While social participation is known as a protective factor against loneliness, not all older adults enjoy social participation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the social participation and loneliness characteristics in communities and their association with the demographic data, health-related variables, objective sleep parameters and rest-activity circadian rhythms with a sample of 242 Taiwan community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults aged 45 to 89 years. Loneliness and social participation levels were grouped in different clusters via Two-Step Cluster Analysis. Subsequently, Chi-square test and ANOVA were performed to identify the differences between clusters with relevant variables. Results showed that five social participation-loneliness clusters were grouped: Average(40.1%), Active-Lonely(3.8%), Not Active-Lonely(13.1%),Active -Not Lonely(5.9%),Not Active -Not Lonely(37.1%). Age, employment status, property management, self-perceived health, depression, life satisfaction and relative amplitude were related to clusters. The Active-Not Lonely cluster was older, had a higher retirement percentage, and higher life satisfaction. Compared with the Not Active-Lonely cluster, the Not Active -Not Lonely cluster had more power to manage their property, felt healthier and less depressive. The Active-Lonely cluster had a high percentage of unemployment and felt unhealthier. The Not Active-Lonely cluster had the lowest relative amplitude, which meant they had weaker rest-activity circadian rhythms. Objective sleep parameters were no difference between each cluster. These findings provide the potential benefits of developing appropriate social care programs to reduce loneliness for middle-aged and older adults via objective data.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"105 ","pages":"848 - 849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.2735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Loneliness among middle-aged and older adults is a growing public health concern in the aging society. While social participation is known as a protective factor against loneliness, not all older adults enjoy social participation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the social participation and loneliness characteristics in communities and their association with the demographic data, health-related variables, objective sleep parameters and rest-activity circadian rhythms with a sample of 242 Taiwan community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults aged 45 to 89 years. Loneliness and social participation levels were grouped in different clusters via Two-Step Cluster Analysis. Subsequently, Chi-square test and ANOVA were performed to identify the differences between clusters with relevant variables. Results showed that five social participation-loneliness clusters were grouped: Average(40.1%), Active-Lonely(3.8%), Not Active-Lonely(13.1%),Active -Not Lonely(5.9%),Not Active -Not Lonely(37.1%). Age, employment status, property management, self-perceived health, depression, life satisfaction and relative amplitude were related to clusters. The Active-Not Lonely cluster was older, had a higher retirement percentage, and higher life satisfaction. Compared with the Not Active-Lonely cluster, the Not Active -Not Lonely cluster had more power to manage their property, felt healthier and less depressive. The Active-Lonely cluster had a high percentage of unemployment and felt unhealthier. The Not Active-Lonely cluster had the lowest relative amplitude, which meant they had weaker rest-activity circadian rhythms. Objective sleep parameters were no difference between each cluster. These findings provide the potential benefits of developing appropriate social care programs to reduce loneliness for middle-aged and older adults via objective data.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.