PLANNING AHEAD FOR POSTHOSPITALIZATION DISCHARGE NEEDS AMONG OLDER ADULTS

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jie Chen, Zequan Wang, Angela Starkweather, Ming-Hui Chen, Hongyu Miao, Hyochol Ahn, Xiaomei Cong
{"title":"PLANNING AHEAD FOR POSTHOSPITALIZATION DISCHARGE NEEDS AMONG OLDER ADULTS","authors":"Jie Chen, Zequan Wang, Angela Starkweather, Ming-Hui Chen, Hongyu Miao, Hyochol Ahn, Xiaomei Cong","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.2584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Frequently hospitalized older adults require assistance at discharge – either with transfer to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or additional support at home. Our research has demonstrated that older adults can effectively plan ahead for their discharge needs (e.g., selecting SNFs) prior to hospitalization but some chose not to. Very little is known about what motivates older adults to plan. We sought to identify what variables impact older adults’ post-hospitalization planning. We surveyed a cohort of non-hospitalized adults age 65+ who received PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL), a tool to help older adults plan for their post-hospitalization needs, and then completed follow-up surveys at one month and every 6 months thereafter. Surveys inquire about their post-discharge plans if they were to be hospitalized, specifically rehabilitation/caregiver preferences. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for baseline hospitalization decision-making, sex, race, self-efficacy, living status, cognitive impairment, and PYL use. 293 subjects were enrolled (mean 73.5 yrs,40.4% non-White;12 mo. retention rate 94.5%). Subjects were more likely to have plans if they had increased chronic conditions (OR 1.23;p>0.05,1.02-1.47), increased medications (OR 1.15;p< 0.01,1.07-1.25), power of attorney (OR 1.84;p< 0.05,1.01-3.38), and used PYL (OR 2.61;p< 0.01,1.45-4.72). Subjects were more likely to have plans if they had higher medical complexity (OR 1.13 [p< 0.05, 1.03-1.24]), limited health literacy (OR 3.13 [p< 0.05, 1.25-7.81]), and used the PYL website (OR 1.72 [P< 0.05,1.00-2.93]) when asked about planning for future post-hospitalization requiring help in the home. Higher medical complexity, limited health literacy, and use of the planning website were associated with increased hospitalization discharge planning.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"24 1","pages":"800 - 801"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.2584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Frequently hospitalized older adults require assistance at discharge – either with transfer to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or additional support at home. Our research has demonstrated that older adults can effectively plan ahead for their discharge needs (e.g., selecting SNFs) prior to hospitalization but some chose not to. Very little is known about what motivates older adults to plan. We sought to identify what variables impact older adults’ post-hospitalization planning. We surveyed a cohort of non-hospitalized adults age 65+ who received PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL), a tool to help older adults plan for their post-hospitalization needs, and then completed follow-up surveys at one month and every 6 months thereafter. Surveys inquire about their post-discharge plans if they were to be hospitalized, specifically rehabilitation/caregiver preferences. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for baseline hospitalization decision-making, sex, race, self-efficacy, living status, cognitive impairment, and PYL use. 293 subjects were enrolled (mean 73.5 yrs,40.4% non-White;12 mo. retention rate 94.5%). Subjects were more likely to have plans if they had increased chronic conditions (OR 1.23;p>0.05,1.02-1.47), increased medications (OR 1.15;p< 0.01,1.07-1.25), power of attorney (OR 1.84;p< 0.05,1.01-3.38), and used PYL (OR 2.61;p< 0.01,1.45-4.72). Subjects were more likely to have plans if they had higher medical complexity (OR 1.13 [p< 0.05, 1.03-1.24]), limited health literacy (OR 3.13 [p< 0.05, 1.25-7.81]), and used the PYL website (OR 1.72 [P< 0.05,1.00-2.93]) when asked about planning for future post-hospitalization requiring help in the home. Higher medical complexity, limited health literacy, and use of the planning website were associated with increased hospitalization discharge planning.
提前规划老年人出院后的需求
摘要 经常住院的老年人在出院时需要帮助--要么转到专业护理机构(SNF),要么在家里需要额外的支持。我们的研究表明,老年人可以在住院前有效地提前规划出院需求(如选择专业护理机构),但有些老年人选择不这样做。我们对促使老年人制定计划的因素知之甚少。我们试图找出影响老年人住院后规划的变量。我们调查了一批 65 岁以上未住院的成年人,他们接受了 PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL)(一种帮助老年人规划住院后需求的工具),然后在一个月后完成了后续调查,之后每 6 个月完成一次调查。调查询问了他们出院后的计划,特别是康复/护理人员的偏好。多变量逻辑回归模型对基线住院决策、性别、种族、自我效能、生活状况、认知障碍和PYL使用情况进行了调整。293 名受试者(平均 73.5 岁,40.4% 为非白人;12 个月保留率 94.5%)参与了研究。如果受试者的慢性病增加(OR 1.23;p>0.05,1.02-1.47)、药物增加(OR 1.15;p<0.01,1.07-1.25)、有委托书(OR 1.84;p<0.05,1.01-3.38)以及使用PYL(OR 2.61;p<0.01,1.45-4.72),则更有可能制定计划。当被问及未来住院后需要家庭帮助的计划时,如果受试者的医疗复杂程度较高(OR 1.13 [P< 0.05, 1.03-1.24])、健康知识水平有限(OR 3.13 [P< 0.05, 1.25-7.81]),并且使用PYL网站(OR 1.72 [P< 0.05,1.00-2.93] ),则更有可能制定计划。较高的医疗复杂性、有限的健康素养以及规划网站的使用与住院出院规划的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信