{"title":"Nerve enlargement differs among chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy subtypes and multifocal motor neuropathy","authors":"Masaaki Yoshikawa , Kenji Sekiguchi , Hirotomo Suehiro , Shunsuke Watanabe , Yoshikatsu Noda , Hideo Hara , Riki Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate differences in ultrasonographic nerve enlargement sites among typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), distal CIDP, multifocal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in a Japanese population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed medical records and selected 39 patients (14 with typical CIDP, 7 with multifocal CIDP, 4 with distal CIDP, and 14 with MMN) who underwent ultrasonography. Median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured at the wrist, forearm, elbow, and upper arm. CSA ratios for each nerve were calculated as: wrist-to-forearm index (WFI) = wrist CSA/forearm CSA; elbow-to-upper arm index (EUI) = elbow CSA/upper arm CSA; and intranerve CSA variability (INCV) = maximal CSA/minimal CSA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences were observed among typical CIDP, multifocal CIDP, distal CIDP, and MMN in CSA at the forearm and upper arm in the median nerves (p < 0.05). Patients with multifocal CIDP had lower WFI and EUI and higher INCV than the other groups (p < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Regardless of the untreated period, compared with other CIDP subtypes and MMN, multifocal CIDP showed a focal and marked nerve enlargement in the Japanese population.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Differences in nerve enlargement site may be an underlying feature of multifocal CIDP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 228-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000306/pdfft?md5=89e10b6a7de27237c3961da380557708&pid=1-s2.0-S2467981X23000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
We aimed to evaluate differences in ultrasonographic nerve enlargement sites among typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), distal CIDP, multifocal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in a Japanese population.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed medical records and selected 39 patients (14 with typical CIDP, 7 with multifocal CIDP, 4 with distal CIDP, and 14 with MMN) who underwent ultrasonography. Median and ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured at the wrist, forearm, elbow, and upper arm. CSA ratios for each nerve were calculated as: wrist-to-forearm index (WFI) = wrist CSA/forearm CSA; elbow-to-upper arm index (EUI) = elbow CSA/upper arm CSA; and intranerve CSA variability (INCV) = maximal CSA/minimal CSA.
Results
Significant differences were observed among typical CIDP, multifocal CIDP, distal CIDP, and MMN in CSA at the forearm and upper arm in the median nerves (p < 0.05). Patients with multifocal CIDP had lower WFI and EUI and higher INCV than the other groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Regardless of the untreated period, compared with other CIDP subtypes and MMN, multifocal CIDP showed a focal and marked nerve enlargement in the Japanese population.
Significance
Differences in nerve enlargement site may be an underlying feature of multifocal CIDP.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.