Efficacy of fungicides for controlling Macrophomina spp. in melon plant

IF 2.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Cynthia P. S. S. Alves, Andréia M. P. Negreiros, Allinny L. A. Cavalcante, Dariane M. Viana, Sara H. F. Oliveira, Rui Sales Júnior
{"title":"Efficacy of fungicides for controlling Macrophomina spp. in melon plant","authors":"Cynthia P. S. S. Alves, Andréia M. P. Negreiros, Allinny L. A. Cavalcante, Dariane M. Viana, Sara H. F. Oliveira, Rui Sales Júnior","doi":"10.1007/s40858-023-00623-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the efficacy of five active ingredients (boscalid, carbendazim, cyprodinil, fluazinam, and fludioxonil) at five concentrations (0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 10.00, and 100.00 mg/L a.i.) against nine <i>Macrophomina</i> isolates (<i>M. phaseolina</i>: CMM1556, CMM4748, and CMM4764; <i>M. pseudophaseolina</i>: CMM2163, CMM4815, and CMM4767; and <i>M. euphorbiicola</i>: CMM2158, CMM4868, and CMM4867). We evaluated daily mycelial growth, growth inhibition percentage, and the effective concentration that inhibits 50% of the radial mycelial growth (EC<sub>50</sub>). Additionally, the <i>in vivo</i> impact of fluazinam and fludioxonil on the incidence and severity of root rot and vine decline, as well as melon plants biometrics, were determined. Increasing fungicide dose resulted in a higher percentage of mycelial growth inhibition, with the most favorable outcomes observed at 100.00 mg/L a.i. for all tested products. Overall, the <i>Macrophomina</i> isolates exhibited greater tolerance to boscalid (EC<sub>50</sub> = 13.40 mg/L a.i.), followed by cyprodinil (EC<sub>50</sub> = 1.18 mg/L a.i.), carbendazim (EC<sub>50</sub> = 0.05 mg/L a.i.), fluazinam (EC<sub>50</sub> = 0.03 mg/L a.i.), and fludioxonil (EC<sub>50</sub> = 0.03 mg/L a.i.). The latter two demonstrated high efficacy <i>in vitro</i>. While none of the products achieved complete control of the fungus <i>in vivo</i>, the lowest incidence and severity of root rot and vine decline in melon plants were 28.57% and 0.29, respectively, in plants inoculated with <i>M. euphorbiicola</i> and treated with fludioxonil. For the other species and isolates, fluazinam exhibited better control, resulting in reduced mass loss and root length.</p>","PeriodicalId":23354,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Plant Pathology","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-023-00623-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the efficacy of five active ingredients (boscalid, carbendazim, cyprodinil, fluazinam, and fludioxonil) at five concentrations (0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 10.00, and 100.00 mg/L a.i.) against nine Macrophomina isolates (M. phaseolina: CMM1556, CMM4748, and CMM4764; M. pseudophaseolina: CMM2163, CMM4815, and CMM4767; and M. euphorbiicola: CMM2158, CMM4868, and CMM4867). We evaluated daily mycelial growth, growth inhibition percentage, and the effective concentration that inhibits 50% of the radial mycelial growth (EC50). Additionally, the in vivo impact of fluazinam and fludioxonil on the incidence and severity of root rot and vine decline, as well as melon plants biometrics, were determined. Increasing fungicide dose resulted in a higher percentage of mycelial growth inhibition, with the most favorable outcomes observed at 100.00 mg/L a.i. for all tested products. Overall, the Macrophomina isolates exhibited greater tolerance to boscalid (EC50 = 13.40 mg/L a.i.), followed by cyprodinil (EC50 = 1.18 mg/L a.i.), carbendazim (EC50 = 0.05 mg/L a.i.), fluazinam (EC50 = 0.03 mg/L a.i.), and fludioxonil (EC50 = 0.03 mg/L a.i.). The latter two demonstrated high efficacy in vitro. While none of the products achieved complete control of the fungus in vivo, the lowest incidence and severity of root rot and vine decline in melon plants were 28.57% and 0.29, respectively, in plants inoculated with M. euphorbiicola and treated with fludioxonil. For the other species and isolates, fluazinam exhibited better control, resulting in reduced mass loss and root length.

Abstract Image

杀菌剂防治甜瓜大霉病的效果研究
本研究评估了5种有效成分(boscalid、多菌灵、环丙二尼、氟嗪南和氟恶菌尼)在5种浓度(0.01、0.10、1.00、10.00和100.00 mg/L a.i)下对9株巨蝇病分离株(phaseolina m.s: CMM1556、CMM4748和CMM4764;假绿脓杆菌:CMM2163、CMM4815和CMM4767;大戟分枝杆菌:CMM2158、CMM4868和CMM4867)。我们评估了每日菌丝生长、生长抑制百分比和抑制50%径向菌丝生长的有效浓度(EC50)。此外,还测定了氟西南和氟恶菌腈在体内对根腐病和葡萄藤衰败的发生率和严重程度以及甜瓜植物生物特征的影响。增加杀真菌剂的剂量导致更高的菌丝生长抑制率,在100.00 mg/L a.i.对所有测试产品观察到最有利的结果。总体而言,Macrophomina菌株对boscalid的耐受性较好(EC50 = 13.40 mg/L a.i),其次是环丙腈(EC50 = 1.18 mg/L a.i)、多菌灵(EC50 = 0.05 mg/L a.i)、氟西南(EC50 = 0.03 mg/L a.i)和氟嘧菌腈(EC50 = 0.03 mg/L a.i)。后两者在体外表现出较高的疗效。虽然没有一种产品能在体内完全控制真菌,但接种大绿霉菌和氟菌灵处理的甜瓜植株根腐病和葡萄藤衰退的发生率和严重程度分别最低,分别为28.57%和0.29%。对其他品种和分离株,氟唑西南表现出较好的控制效果,减少了质量损失和根长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Plant Pathology
Tropical Plant Pathology PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Plant Pathology is an international journal devoted to publishing a wide range of research on fundamental and applied aspects of plant diseases of concern to agricultural, forest and ornamental crops from tropical and subtropical environments.  Submissions must report original research that provides new insights into the etiology and epidemiology of plant disease as well as population biology of plant pathogens, host-pathogen interactions, physiological and molecular plant pathology, and strategies to promote crop protection. The journal considers for publication: original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor. For more details please check the submission guidelines. Founded in 1976, the journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Phytopathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信