A reliability study of the Park Life public participatory geographic information system survey

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Paula Hooper, Nicole Edwards
{"title":"A reliability study of the Park Life public participatory geographic information system survey","authors":"Paula Hooper,&nbsp;Nicole Edwards","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Planning policy for parks is typically guided by a standard approach that fails to account for how communities actually use parks. Moreover, few researchers know the exact parks people use, even though “use” is often hypothesised in the relationships being tested. Public participatory geographic information systems (PPGISs) present an opportunity to collect specific, spatially referenced information on park use and park-based activities. However, the reliability of these instruments has not been studied. The Park Life PPGIS captured residential location, park location, and park-based behavioural data from a sample of adults and was tested for reliability. Kappa scores and intra-class correlations assessed the reliability of the items. Recall of individual items all showed acceptable reliability and mostly achieved “substantial” agreement or “near-perfect” agreement. The Park Life PPGIS is a reliable instrument to capture park use and activities. Such information is essential for public health and physical activity researchers, urban planners, and park managers to develop informed planning and public health policies and programs that promote park use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"134-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12629","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planning policy for parks is typically guided by a standard approach that fails to account for how communities actually use parks. Moreover, few researchers know the exact parks people use, even though “use” is often hypothesised in the relationships being tested. Public participatory geographic information systems (PPGISs) present an opportunity to collect specific, spatially referenced information on park use and park-based activities. However, the reliability of these instruments has not been studied. The Park Life PPGIS captured residential location, park location, and park-based behavioural data from a sample of adults and was tested for reliability. Kappa scores and intra-class correlations assessed the reliability of the items. Recall of individual items all showed acceptable reliability and mostly achieved “substantial” agreement or “near-perfect” agreement. The Park Life PPGIS is a reliable instrument to capture park use and activities. Such information is essential for public health and physical activity researchers, urban planners, and park managers to develop informed planning and public health policies and programs that promote park use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

公园生活公众参与式地理信息系统调查的可靠性研究
公园的规划政策通常是由一种标准方法指导的,这种方法没有考虑到社区实际如何使用公园。此外,很少有研究人员知道人们确切使用的公园,尽管在被测试的关系中,“使用”通常是假设的。公共参与式地理信息系统(ppgis)为收集公园使用和公园活动的具体空间参考信息提供了机会。然而,这些仪器的可靠性尚未得到研究。Park Life PPGIS从成人样本中获取了住宅位置、公园位置和基于公园的行为数据,并对其进行了可靠性测试。Kappa分数和班级内相关性评估了项目的可靠性。个别项目的召回都显示出可接受的可靠性,并且大多数达到了“实质性”一致或“近乎完美”的一致。公园生活PPGIS是捕捉公园使用和活动的可靠工具。这些信息对于公共卫生和体育活动研究人员、城市规划者和公园管理者制定明智的规划和公共卫生政策以及促进公园使用的项目至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信