{"title":"Comparing online user experience across different digital business ecosystems and platforms when booking vacations","authors":"Saïd Aboubaker Ettis, Jean-Éric Pelet, Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky","doi":"10.1007/s11846-023-00712-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While various combinations of business eco-systems (desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile, smartwatch, and TV) and platforms (apps, websites, and social media pages) can be used to shop online, little is known about consumers’ preferences to choose one over another. The user experience on each eco-touchpoint and eco-channel is not the same. By comparing four groups of respondents (595 observations) using two different systems (Brand Website vs. Brand Facebook page) and two different channels (PC vs. Smartphone), this research examines how utilitarian values, hedonic values, satisfaction, and flow experience, might differ across these various business ecosystems for those booking a vacation. Participants were randomly guided to one of the four experimental groups based on their device. The results show that flow experience, utilitarian values, and hedonic values influence booking intentions. These effects differ from digital platform to digital platform and from one e-channel to another. This research deepens our theoretical understanding of the online user experience across business ecosystems and gives practical insights into how e-retailers could enhance consumers’ shopping experiences through the different e-channel and digital platforms that contribute, in a different way, to the online experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"54 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00712-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While various combinations of business eco-systems (desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile, smartwatch, and TV) and platforms (apps, websites, and social media pages) can be used to shop online, little is known about consumers’ preferences to choose one over another. The user experience on each eco-touchpoint and eco-channel is not the same. By comparing four groups of respondents (595 observations) using two different systems (Brand Website vs. Brand Facebook page) and two different channels (PC vs. Smartphone), this research examines how utilitarian values, hedonic values, satisfaction, and flow experience, might differ across these various business ecosystems for those booking a vacation. Participants were randomly guided to one of the four experimental groups based on their device. The results show that flow experience, utilitarian values, and hedonic values influence booking intentions. These effects differ from digital platform to digital platform and from one e-channel to another. This research deepens our theoretical understanding of the online user experience across business ecosystems and gives practical insights into how e-retailers could enhance consumers’ shopping experiences through the different e-channel and digital platforms that contribute, in a different way, to the online experience.
期刊介绍:
Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.