Personality traits and mediating pathways to mortality risk: A systematic review.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1037/hea0001335
Christopher S Grogan, Nicholas A Turiano, Andrea Habenicht, Máire McGeehan, Páraic S O'Súilleabháin
{"title":"Personality traits and mediating pathways to mortality risk: A systematic review.","authors":"Christopher S Grogan, Nicholas A Turiano, Andrea Habenicht, Máire McGeehan, Páraic S O'Súilleabháin","doi":"10.1037/hea0001335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Personality traits have been regularly linked with all-cause mortality risk. However, what mechanisms may provide an indirect pathway from personality traits to mortality is unclear. We sought to systematically review the literature and provide an overview of the potential mechanisms that have been identified in the literature.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and PsycArticles) were searched from inception to January 27, 2023. From 611 studies initially identified, seven studies met the final inclusion criteria. These seven papers have a combined sample of 60,104 individuals (<i>M</i> = 8,585, <i>SD</i> = 14,600; range 957-44,094).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These papers found that several variables, such as smoking, inflammation biomarkers, blood pressure, and sleep, mediated the relationship between various personality traits and mortality. There was considerable variation in the impact of results across cohorts, even when looking at similar variables, and notable differences in methodological approaches and reporting were discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified a small pool of research looking at a range of indirect pathways (mediating variables). The review identified traits with well-established associations with mortality risk, such as neuroticism, do not have consistent findings in the mediation literature and a high level of variance in the degree to which mediators account for the personality-mortality relation between different cohorts. Despite these limitations, it is clear that examining indirect effects (mediation) has a crucial role to play in developing our understanding of the complex pathways that connect personality-mortality risk. We identify several avenues and considerations for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"214-224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Personality traits have been regularly linked with all-cause mortality risk. However, what mechanisms may provide an indirect pathway from personality traits to mortality is unclear. We sought to systematically review the literature and provide an overview of the potential mechanisms that have been identified in the literature.

Method: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and PsycArticles) were searched from inception to January 27, 2023. From 611 studies initially identified, seven studies met the final inclusion criteria. These seven papers have a combined sample of 60,104 individuals (M = 8,585, SD = 14,600; range 957-44,094).

Results: These papers found that several variables, such as smoking, inflammation biomarkers, blood pressure, and sleep, mediated the relationship between various personality traits and mortality. There was considerable variation in the impact of results across cohorts, even when looking at similar variables, and notable differences in methodological approaches and reporting were discussed.

Conclusions: This review identified a small pool of research looking at a range of indirect pathways (mediating variables). The review identified traits with well-established associations with mortality risk, such as neuroticism, do not have consistent findings in the mediation literature and a high level of variance in the degree to which mediators account for the personality-mortality relation between different cohorts. Despite these limitations, it is clear that examining indirect effects (mediation) has a crucial role to play in developing our understanding of the complex pathways that connect personality-mortality risk. We identify several avenues and considerations for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

人格特质和死亡风险的中介途径:系统回顾。
目的:人格特征通常与全因死亡风险有关。然而,什么机制可能提供从人格特征到死亡率的间接途径尚不清楚。我们试图系统地回顾文献,并对文献中已确定的潜在机制进行概述。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycInfo、PsycArticles 5个电子数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年1月27日。从最初确定的611项研究中,有7项研究符合最终纳入标准。这七篇论文总共有60104个人的样本(M = 8585, SD = 14600;范围957 - 44094)。结果:这些论文发现,吸烟、炎症生物标志物、血压和睡眠等几个变量介导了各种人格特质与死亡率之间的关系。即使在观察相似的变量时,各队列结果的影响也存在相当大的差异,并且讨论了方法学方法和报告的显着差异。结论:本综述确定了一小部分研究着眼于一系列间接途径(中介变量)。该综述确定了与死亡风险有明确关联的特征,如神经质,但在中介文献中没有一致的发现,并且在不同队列中,中介因素对人格-死亡率关系的解释程度存在很大差异。尽管存在这些限制,但很明显,检查间接影响(调解)在发展我们对连接人格-死亡风险的复杂途径的理解方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们确定了未来研究的几个途径和考虑因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信