Goal orientation, critical reflection, and unlearning: An individual-level study

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
{"title":"Goal orientation, critical reflection, and unlearning: An individual-level study","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Matsuo (2017), an error was published on page 56 under section 3.3.6, where the article reads.</p><p><b>3.3. 6 Unlearning</b></p><p>As described above, the scale of team unlearning developed by Akgun et al. (2006) was modified to measure individual unlearning. The scale consists of belief change (three items) and routine change (three items). The following belief change items were used: “beliefs on technological improvements,” “beliefs on the external environment,” and “beliefs on customer (patient) demand.” The items of routine change are “work methods or procedures,” “methods for gathering and sharing information,” and “decision-making processes or methods.” Respondents were asked to rate the changes in their beliefs and routines in the past year on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = greatly changed, 5 = hardly changed). Cronbach's alpha for unlearning (belief) and unlearning (routine) were .81 and .83, respectively. The average scores for each type of unlearning were used as observable variables.</p><p>It should read:</p><p><b>3.3.6 Unlearning</b></p><p>As described above, the scale of team unlearning developed by Akgun et al. (2006) was modified to measure individual unlearning. The scale consists of belief change (three items) and routine change (three items). The following belief change items were used: “beliefs on technological improvements,” “beliefs on the external environment,” and “beliefs on customer (patient) demand.” The items of routine change are “work methods or procedures,” “methods for gathering and sharing information,” and “decision-making processes or methods.” Respondents were asked to rate the changes in their beliefs and routines in the past year on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = hardly changed, 5 = greatly changed). Cronbach's alpha for unlearning (belief) and unlearning (routine) were .81 and .83, respectively. The average scores for each type of unlearning were used as observable variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrdq.21469","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Matsuo (2017), an error was published on page 56 under section 3.3.6, where the article reads.

3.3. 6 Unlearning

As described above, the scale of team unlearning developed by Akgun et al. (2006) was modified to measure individual unlearning. The scale consists of belief change (three items) and routine change (three items). The following belief change items were used: “beliefs on technological improvements,” “beliefs on the external environment,” and “beliefs on customer (patient) demand.” The items of routine change are “work methods or procedures,” “methods for gathering and sharing information,” and “decision-making processes or methods.” Respondents were asked to rate the changes in their beliefs and routines in the past year on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = greatly changed, 5 = hardly changed). Cronbach's alpha for unlearning (belief) and unlearning (routine) were .81 and .83, respectively. The average scores for each type of unlearning were used as observable variables.

It should read:

3.3.6 Unlearning

As described above, the scale of team unlearning developed by Akgun et al. (2006) was modified to measure individual unlearning. The scale consists of belief change (three items) and routine change (three items). The following belief change items were used: “beliefs on technological improvements,” “beliefs on the external environment,” and “beliefs on customer (patient) demand.” The items of routine change are “work methods or procedures,” “methods for gathering and sharing information,” and “decision-making processes or methods.” Respondents were asked to rate the changes in their beliefs and routines in the past year on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = hardly changed, 5 = greatly changed). Cronbach's alpha for unlearning (belief) and unlearning (routine) were .81 and .83, respectively. The average scores for each type of unlearning were used as observable variables.

目标导向、批判性反思与遗忘:一项个人层面的研究
在Matsuo(2017)中,第56页第3.3.6节下发布了一个错误,其中文章为。3.3。如上所述,我们对Akgun等人(2006)开发的团队遗忘量表进行了修改,以衡量个体的遗忘。量表由信念改变(三个项目)和习惯改变(三个项目)组成。使用了以下信念改变项目:“对技术改进的信念”、“对外部环境的信念”和“对客户(患者)需求的信念”。日常变化的项目是“工作方法或程序”、“收集和共享信息的方法”和“决策过程或方法”。受访者被要求用5分的李克特量表(1 =变化很大,5 =几乎没有变化)对过去一年中他们的信仰和习惯的变化进行评分。遗忘(信念)和遗忘(常规)的Cronbach's alpha分别为0.81和0.83。各遗忘类型的平均得分作为可观察变量。如前所述,我们对Akgun等人(2006)开发的团队遗忘量表进行了修改,以衡量个体的遗忘。量表由信念改变(三个项目)和习惯改变(三个项目)组成。使用了以下信念改变项目:“对技术改进的信念”、“对外部环境的信念”和“对客户(患者)需求的信念”。日常变化的项目是“工作方法或程序”、“收集和共享信息的方法”和“决策过程或方法”。受访者被要求用5分的李克特量表(1 =几乎没有变化,5 =变化很大)对过去一年中他们的信仰和习惯的变化进行评分。遗忘(信念)和遗忘(常规)的Cronbach's alpha分别为0.81和0.83。各遗忘类型的平均得分作为可观察变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信