Pandemic surveillance and mobilities across Sydney, New South Wales

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Duncan McDuie-Ra, Daniel F. Robinson, Kalervo N. Gulson
{"title":"Pandemic surveillance and mobilities across Sydney, New South Wales","authors":"Duncan McDuie-Ra,&nbsp;Daniel F. Robinson,&nbsp;Kalervo N. Gulson","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In response to the acute public health crisis of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, governments in Australia and around the world rushed to institute technologies to track human bodies with “live” surveillance. In Australia, “lockdowns” halted human mobilities in all states for different periods, and technologies for tracking bodies and collecting data were introduced after and between physical lockdowns. In this article, we analyse both the monitoring technologies developed to contend with COVID-19 and the complex array of regulations and public health orders governing space and mobility in New South Wales and Sydney. Our focus on monitoring technologies is based on the COVIDSafe App (National) and the New South Wales COVIDSafe Check-in App. These apps enabled the surveillance of individual mobilities before their sudden demise apparently unrelated to the public health scenario at the time. We argue that these technologies are examples of sensory power which rapidly enrolled human bodies in systems of surveillance that were difficult to unravel through 2022 and beyond. Our focus on regulations and public health orders outlines the shifting legal geographies during public health crisis and the ways these were enacted as mobility restrictions, surveillance, and punishment in western Sydney. We argue that the scars of the peak pandemic will endure in particular locations and communities, signalling the persistence of sensory power beyond the life of specific COVID-19 tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"45-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12618","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the acute public health crisis of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, governments in Australia and around the world rushed to institute technologies to track human bodies with “live” surveillance. In Australia, “lockdowns” halted human mobilities in all states for different periods, and technologies for tracking bodies and collecting data were introduced after and between physical lockdowns. In this article, we analyse both the monitoring technologies developed to contend with COVID-19 and the complex array of regulations and public health orders governing space and mobility in New South Wales and Sydney. Our focus on monitoring technologies is based on the COVIDSafe App (National) and the New South Wales COVIDSafe Check-in App. These apps enabled the surveillance of individual mobilities before their sudden demise apparently unrelated to the public health scenario at the time. We argue that these technologies are examples of sensory power which rapidly enrolled human bodies in systems of surveillance that were difficult to unravel through 2022 and beyond. Our focus on regulations and public health orders outlines the shifting legal geographies during public health crisis and the ways these were enacted as mobility restrictions, surveillance, and punishment in western Sydney. We argue that the scars of the peak pandemic will endure in particular locations and communities, signalling the persistence of sensory power beyond the life of specific COVID-19 tools.

Abstract Image

新南威尔士州悉尼市的流行病监测和流动性
为了应对 2020 年和 2021 年 COVID-19 的严重公共卫生危机,澳大利亚和世界各国政府急忙采用 "实时 "监控技术追踪人体。在澳大利亚,"封锁 "使各州在不同时期停止了人员流动,而在封锁之后和封锁之间则引入了追踪人体和收集数据的技术。在本文中,我们分析了为应对 COVID-19 而开发的监控技术,以及新南威尔士州和悉尼市管理空间和流动性的一系列复杂的法规和公共卫生命令。我们对监控技术的关注是基于 COVIDSafe 应用程序(全国)和新南威尔士 COVIDSafe 签到应用程序。这些应用程序在与当时的公共卫生形势明显无关的情况下突然消失之前,实现了对个人流动性的监控。我们认为,这些技术是感官力量的典范,它们迅速将人体纳入监控系统,而这种监控系统在 2022 年及以后都难以解开。我们对法规和公共卫生令的关注概述了公共卫生危机期间不断变化的法律地域,以及这些法规在悉尼西部作为流动限制、监视和惩罚的方式。我们认为,疫情高峰期留下的伤疤将在特定地点和社区持续存在,这表明感官权力在 COVID-19 特定工具的生命周期之后依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信