Understanding student teachers’ strengths and areas of need in a simulated consultation evening

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rose Sebastian, Anandita Krishnamachari, Andrew McCartney
{"title":"Understanding student teachers’ strengths and areas of need in a simulated consultation evening","authors":"Rose Sebastian, Anandita Krishnamachari, Andrew McCartney","doi":"10.1080/02607476.2023.2274930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTConsultation evenings, also known as parent-teacher conferences, are important opportunities for teachers to strengthen their relationships with caregivers. Many teachers, however, are unprepared, having had few opportunities to build skills and participate in real consultations during teacher training. To provide student teachers with more practice opportunities, some teacher educators have begun supplementing students teachers’ real-world consultations with simulations. Our goal in this study was to use findings on students’ strengths and challenges in a simulated consultation to inform the design of future practice opportunities. Using factor analysis and descriptive statistics, we analysed 206 transcripts from 106 student teachers’ simulations to uncover patterns in their consultations. We found that students were consistently good at sharing positive information about the pupil. Student teachers had more challenges finding the balance between facilitating a productive meeting and a collaborative one. Students also varied in how well they created and maintained a welcoming meeting environment when challenged by the caregiver or presented with a personal disclosure. Based on these findings, we propose designing targeted approximations of practice for consultations, in addition to more holistic ones, so that students can build skills in areas such as finding the balance between productivity and collaboration in a meeting.KEYWORDS: Parent–teacher communicationsimulation design and trainingpreservice teacher educationparent-teacher conferenceshome-school partnerships Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Bankard Trust; Spencer Foundation; University of Virginia.","PeriodicalId":47457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2023.2274930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTConsultation evenings, also known as parent-teacher conferences, are important opportunities for teachers to strengthen their relationships with caregivers. Many teachers, however, are unprepared, having had few opportunities to build skills and participate in real consultations during teacher training. To provide student teachers with more practice opportunities, some teacher educators have begun supplementing students teachers’ real-world consultations with simulations. Our goal in this study was to use findings on students’ strengths and challenges in a simulated consultation to inform the design of future practice opportunities. Using factor analysis and descriptive statistics, we analysed 206 transcripts from 106 student teachers’ simulations to uncover patterns in their consultations. We found that students were consistently good at sharing positive information about the pupil. Student teachers had more challenges finding the balance between facilitating a productive meeting and a collaborative one. Students also varied in how well they created and maintained a welcoming meeting environment when challenged by the caregiver or presented with a personal disclosure. Based on these findings, we propose designing targeted approximations of practice for consultations, in addition to more holistic ones, so that students can build skills in areas such as finding the balance between productivity and collaboration in a meeting.KEYWORDS: Parent–teacher communicationsimulation design and trainingpreservice teacher educationparent-teacher conferenceshome-school partnerships Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Bankard Trust; Spencer Foundation; University of Virginia.
通过模拟咨询夜了解实习教师的优势和需求
【摘要】咨询之夜,也被称为家长会,是教师加强与照顾者关系的重要机会。然而,许多教师没有做好准备,在教师培训期间几乎没有机会培养技能和参与真正的咨询。为了给实习教师提供更多的实践机会,一些教师教育工作者已经开始用模拟来补充实习教师的现实咨询。我们在这项研究中的目标是在模拟咨询中使用对学生优势和挑战的调查结果来告知未来实践机会的设计。利用因子分析和描述性统计,我们分析了106名学生教师模拟的206份成绩单,以揭示他们的咨询模式。我们发现,学生们一贯善于分享有关学生的正面信息。实习教师在促进富有成效的会议和协作会议之间找到平衡方面面临更多挑战。在面对照顾者的挑战或面对个人信息披露时,学生们在创造和维持一个友好的会议环境方面也存在差异。基于这些发现,我们建议为咨询设计有针对性的近似练习,以及更全面的练习,这样学生就可以在会议中找到生产力和协作之间的平衡等领域培养技能。关键词:亲子交流模拟设计与培训职前教师教育家长会家校合作披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了Bankard Trust的支持;斯宾塞的基础;弗吉尼亚大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Teaching
Journal of Education for Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Teaching is an established international refereed periodical which publishes original contributions on the subject of teacher education. The journal interprets "teacher education" in the widest sense, to include initial training, in-service education and staff development. The editors welcome scholarly discussions of new issues, reports of research projects or surveys of research work in particular fields, and contributions to current debates in teacher education throughout the world, generally or on specific issues.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信