{"title":"Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on knowledge sharing: does gender make a difference?","authors":"Jinfeng Zhang, Xin Wen, Mingjie Zhou","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2023.2269919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTKnowledge sharing is essentially a product of interpersonal interaction, and the knowledge provider’s and receiver’s personalities should be considered in exploring how personality affect knowledge sharing. Following the actor – partner interdependence model, we examined the actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on knowledge sharing in co-worker dyads, and the moderating role of gender in a sample of 528 technical employees from 38 teams. Results showed that (a) individuals who scored higher on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness or lower on neuroticism were more willing to share their knowledge; (b) knowledge receivers with higher agreeableness and conscientiousness or lower neuroticism promoted knowledge providers’ knowledge sharing; (c) personality similarity did not significantly affect the dyad’s knowledge sharing; and (d) the actor effect and the partner effect of conscientiousness and the similarity effect of openness showed different patterns between same-gender and opposite-gender dyads. We highlighted personality’s dyadic impact on co-workers’ knowledge sharing.KEYWORDS: Personalityknowledge sharingactor-partner interdependence modelgender difference Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71774156]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2022CDSKXYGG006; 2019GGXY04]; Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China [CYS22099]; Social Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [No.2022NDYB90].","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2269919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTKnowledge sharing is essentially a product of interpersonal interaction, and the knowledge provider’s and receiver’s personalities should be considered in exploring how personality affect knowledge sharing. Following the actor – partner interdependence model, we examined the actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on knowledge sharing in co-worker dyads, and the moderating role of gender in a sample of 528 technical employees from 38 teams. Results showed that (a) individuals who scored higher on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness or lower on neuroticism were more willing to share their knowledge; (b) knowledge receivers with higher agreeableness and conscientiousness or lower neuroticism promoted knowledge providers’ knowledge sharing; (c) personality similarity did not significantly affect the dyad’s knowledge sharing; and (d) the actor effect and the partner effect of conscientiousness and the similarity effect of openness showed different patterns between same-gender and opposite-gender dyads. We highlighted personality’s dyadic impact on co-workers’ knowledge sharing.KEYWORDS: Personalityknowledge sharingactor-partner interdependence modelgender difference Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71774156]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2022CDSKXYGG006; 2019GGXY04]; Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China [CYS22099]; Social Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [No.2022NDYB90].
期刊介绍:
Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.