{"title":"Islamic Religious Education and Interreligious Tolerance in a Multi-Religious Country: Challenges, Typological Implications, and the Proposed Strategy","authors":"Mohamad Iwan Fitriani","doi":"10.20414/ujis.v27i1.765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines contemporary challenges relating to the realization of intra- and interreligious tolerance within the Indonesian Islamic Religious Education (IRE) system. To this end, I identify three areas requiring revisiting: the challenges facing teachers of IRE regarding the promotion of intra- and interreligious tolerance, the implications of these challenges for typologies of student tolerance and intolerance, and the proposed strategy to cope with the challenges. The study utilizes a qualitative approach across multiple sites. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and observation at a madrasah (MA, Indonesian: Madrasah Aliyah) and two high schools (SMA, Indonesian: Sekolah Menengah Atas). Data were analyzed through six steps of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. This research finds that: (1) challenges related to the emergence of intra- and interreligious intolerance are traced to the domination of the mono-religious education model within the study of IRE in MA and SMAs; (2) the domination of this mono-religious education model is implicated in several tolerance and intolerance student typologies, such as active-passive intolerance and active-passive tolerance and active intra- and interreligious tolerance; (3) the proposed strategy to cope with challenges faced by IRE teachers to promote intra and inter-religious tolerance is mutual enrichment religious education model, which could be supported via macro-, meso-, and micro-educational system policy and regulation. The proposed model significantly contributes to integrating gradually three pivotal elements constructing intra and interreligious tolerance, namely, \"my truth,\" \"your truth,\" and \"our truth.\"","PeriodicalId":55654,"journal":{"name":"Ulumuna","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulumuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research examines contemporary challenges relating to the realization of intra- and interreligious tolerance within the Indonesian Islamic Religious Education (IRE) system. To this end, I identify three areas requiring revisiting: the challenges facing teachers of IRE regarding the promotion of intra- and interreligious tolerance, the implications of these challenges for typologies of student tolerance and intolerance, and the proposed strategy to cope with the challenges. The study utilizes a qualitative approach across multiple sites. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and observation at a madrasah (MA, Indonesian: Madrasah Aliyah) and two high schools (SMA, Indonesian: Sekolah Menengah Atas). Data were analyzed through six steps of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. This research finds that: (1) challenges related to the emergence of intra- and interreligious intolerance are traced to the domination of the mono-religious education model within the study of IRE in MA and SMAs; (2) the domination of this mono-religious education model is implicated in several tolerance and intolerance student typologies, such as active-passive intolerance and active-passive tolerance and active intra- and interreligious tolerance; (3) the proposed strategy to cope with challenges faced by IRE teachers to promote intra and inter-religious tolerance is mutual enrichment religious education model, which could be supported via macro-, meso-, and micro-educational system policy and regulation. The proposed model significantly contributes to integrating gradually three pivotal elements constructing intra and interreligious tolerance, namely, "my truth," "your truth," and "our truth."
本研究探讨了与印度尼西亚伊斯兰宗教教育系统内实现宗教间和宗教间宽容有关的当代挑战。为此,我确定了三个需要重新审视的领域:高等教育学院教师在促进宗教内部和宗教间宽容方面面临的挑战,这些挑战对学生宽容和不宽容类型的影响,以及应对这些挑战的拟议策略。该研究采用了跨多个站点的定性方法。通过深入访谈、文献分析和在一所伊斯兰学校(MA,印尼语:madrasah Aliyah)和两所高中(SMA,印尼语:Sekolah Menengah Atas)的观察收集数据。通过Braun和Clarke的主题分析的六个步骤来分析数据。本研究发现:(1)与宗教内部和宗教间不宽容的出现相关的挑战可以追溯到单一宗教教育模式在MA和sma的IRE研究中的主导地位;(2)这种单一宗教教育模式的主导地位涉及到几个宽容和不宽容的学生类型,如主动被动不宽容、主动被动宽容和主动宗教内和宗教间宽容;(3)为应对IRE教师面临的挑战,促进宗教内部和宗教间的宽容,建议的策略是相互充实的宗教教育模式,这可以通过宏观、中观和微观教育系统政策和法规来支持。该模型有助于逐步整合构建宗教内部和宗教间宽容的三个关键要素,即“我的真相”、“你的真相”和“我们的真相”。