A Clinical-Community Comparison of Parent-Child Emotion Conversations About the Past and the Anticipated Future

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Sophie Russell, Amy L. Bird, Jane S. Herbert
{"title":"A Clinical-Community Comparison of Parent-Child Emotion Conversations About the Past and the Anticipated Future","authors":"Sophie Russell, Amy L. Bird, Jane S. Herbert","doi":"10.1177/02724316231210247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess differences in emotion and elaboration quality between clinical and community child cohorts in both past reminiscing and future worry conversations. We analyzed 54 Australian parents (46 mothers, 8 fathers) and their 8- to 12-year-old children ( M = 9.63, SD = 1.29; 28 boys, 26 girls) in reminiscing interactions. Dyads were recruited from local schools (community cohort, n = 26) or a children’s psychology clinic waitlist (clinical cohort, n = 28). Clinical cohort children engaged in less emotion exploration in both past and future conversations, as did parents for future conversations. Elaboration quality did not differ. Parent-son dyads differed in the clinical cohort, exhibiting significantly lower emotion resolution than the community cohort, or parent-daughter dyads when discussing past events. These findings suggest that discussing anticipated negative events may be a relevant point of family-based intervention for anxious children. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of parent-son emotional discussion.","PeriodicalId":51412,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231210247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to assess differences in emotion and elaboration quality between clinical and community child cohorts in both past reminiscing and future worry conversations. We analyzed 54 Australian parents (46 mothers, 8 fathers) and their 8- to 12-year-old children ( M = 9.63, SD = 1.29; 28 boys, 26 girls) in reminiscing interactions. Dyads were recruited from local schools (community cohort, n = 26) or a children’s psychology clinic waitlist (clinical cohort, n = 28). Clinical cohort children engaged in less emotion exploration in both past and future conversations, as did parents for future conversations. Elaboration quality did not differ. Parent-son dyads differed in the clinical cohort, exhibiting significantly lower emotion resolution than the community cohort, or parent-daughter dyads when discussing past events. These findings suggest that discussing anticipated negative events may be a relevant point of family-based intervention for anxious children. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of parent-son emotional discussion.
关于过去和预期未来的亲子情感对话的临床-社区比较
本研究旨在评估临床和社区儿童在过去回忆和未来担忧对话中的情绪和阐述质量差异。我们分析了54位澳大利亚父母(46位母亲,8位父亲)及其8- 12岁的孩子(M = 9.63, SD = 1.29;28个男孩,26个女孩)回忆互动。从当地学校(社区队列,n = 26)或儿童心理诊所候诊名单(临床队列,n = 28)中招募二人组。临床队列儿童在过去和未来的谈话中都较少进行情感探索,父母在未来的谈话中也是如此。精化质量没有差别。父子二人组在临床队列中表现出明显低于社区队列的情绪解决方案,或者在讨论过去事件时的亲子二人组。这些发现表明,讨论预期的负面事件可能是家庭干预焦虑儿童的一个相关点。此外,本研究强调亲子情感讨论的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Adolescence publishes articles that increase our understanding of individuals, 10 through 14 years of age, in the life span. The journal is designed to present major theoretical papers, state-of-the-art papers, and current research, as well as reviews of important professional books and early adolescent films and literature. A complete Policy Statement and information about submissions are available from the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信