How land-use planning in multifunctional regions shapes spaces for farming

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Bill Pritchard, Elen Welch, Guillermo Umaña Restrepo
{"title":"How land-use planning in multifunctional regions shapes spaces for farming","authors":"Bill Pritchard,&nbsp;Elen Welch,&nbsp;Guillermo Umaña Restrepo","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In multifunctional rural regions, strong commercial incentives exist for agricultural landholders to convert their land from farming to residential, lifestyle, and tourist land uses. In Australia, those regions mainly comprise coastal, peri-urban, and high-amenity rural areas. The pace and pattern of land-use conversion in these regions is shaped by the interaction of landholders with land-use planning regulations, notably minimum lot size (MLS) controls. This paper examines that interface in a deep dive into the role of land-use planning controls in shaping the future of farming in an area of rapid rural change, the Ballina-Lismore region in northern New South Wales. We argue that although planning controls in the region are designed to protect land for agriculture by curbing pressures for suburbanisation, they have also inadvertently contributed to the proliferation of <i>unplanned rural living</i>. This proliferation has occurred because MLS controls have incentivised agricultural landholders to sidestep restrictions on subdivision by exploiting concessions and flexibility in some of the controls and have forced some nonagricultural buyers of rural land to acquire bigger holdings than they may have otherwise desired, hence “sterilising” these agricultural-zoned landholdings from farming. We conclude that to better protect agriculture in multifunctional rural regions, land-use planning needs to look beyond deterrence mechanisms, such as MLS restrictions, and towards planning incentives to promote farming on agricultural-zoned land.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"117-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In multifunctional rural regions, strong commercial incentives exist for agricultural landholders to convert their land from farming to residential, lifestyle, and tourist land uses. In Australia, those regions mainly comprise coastal, peri-urban, and high-amenity rural areas. The pace and pattern of land-use conversion in these regions is shaped by the interaction of landholders with land-use planning regulations, notably minimum lot size (MLS) controls. This paper examines that interface in a deep dive into the role of land-use planning controls in shaping the future of farming in an area of rapid rural change, the Ballina-Lismore region in northern New South Wales. We argue that although planning controls in the region are designed to protect land for agriculture by curbing pressures for suburbanisation, they have also inadvertently contributed to the proliferation of unplanned rural living. This proliferation has occurred because MLS controls have incentivised agricultural landholders to sidestep restrictions on subdivision by exploiting concessions and flexibility in some of the controls and have forced some nonagricultural buyers of rural land to acquire bigger holdings than they may have otherwise desired, hence “sterilising” these agricultural-zoned landholdings from farming. We conclude that to better protect agriculture in multifunctional rural regions, land-use planning needs to look beyond deterrence mechanisms, such as MLS restrictions, and towards planning incentives to promote farming on agricultural-zoned land.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多功能地区的土地利用规划如何塑造农业空间
在多功能农村地区,农业土地所有者有强烈的商业动机将其土地从耕种用途转变为居住、生活和旅游用途。在澳大利亚,这些地区主要包括沿海地区、城市周边地区和高密度农村地区。这些地区土地用途转换的速度和模式取决于土地所有者与土地用途规划法规的相互作用,特别是最小地块面积(MLS)控制。本文通过深入研究土地使用规划控制在塑造农村快速变化地区(新南威尔士州北部的巴利纳-利斯摩尔地区)未来农业发展中的作用,探讨了这种互动关系。我们认为,虽然该地区的规划控制旨在通过抑制郊区化压力来保护农业用地,但也无意中造成了无规划农村生活的扩散。出现这种现象的原因是,规划控制措施鼓励农业用地所有者通过利用某些控制措施中的优惠和灵活性来规避细分土地的限制,并迫使一些农村土地的非农业买家购买比他们原本想要的更大的土地,从而 "扼杀 "了这些农业用地的耕作。我们的结论是,为了更好地保护多功能农村地区的农业,土地利用规划需要超越威慑机制(如土地增值税限制),转而采取规划激励措施,促进农业用地的耕作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信