Which course resources and student approaches to learning are related to higher grades in introductory biology?

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sarah Adkins, Kynadi Brasfield, Tam Tran, J. Jeffrey Morris, Samiksha Raut
{"title":"Which course resources and student approaches to learning are related to higher grades in introductory biology?","authors":"Sarah Adkins, Kynadi Brasfield, Tam Tran, J. Jeffrey Morris, Samiksha Raut","doi":"10.31756/jrsmte.633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Undergraduate students in large enrollment gateway courses like introductory biology are often inundated with different study resources to enhance their success on course exams. A good performance on these exams as measured by course grades is a strong determinant of their downstream success in the biology major and ultimately retention in STEM fields. Previous studies have suggested best-practices like pre-class reading guides or Supplemental Instruction. However, many of these studies do not also corroborate student course outcomes with Student Approaches to Learning (SAL). We investigated the association between specific resources and how they correlated with higher exam grades. We further investigated the degree to which SAL also correlated with student outcomes. We collected data over a span of two years from a large introductory biology course (N= 307) from a southeastern university by using a post-semester resource questionnaire. This questionnaire asked the students to describe the study resources they had utilized during the course of the semester and further assessed SAL via the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Our results indicate that students who earned a higher overall grade in the course were significantly more likely to self-report higher attendance in optional peer-led Supplemental Instruction meetings and, unexpectedly, were less likely to use pre-class reading guides. These students were more likely to report finding course material interesting, whereas students with lower overall final grades were more likely to report trying to memorize course material. However, we also found that students with higher course grades and high previous college GPAs also reported using rote memorization. Given that the efficacy of resources can vary based on the student, we not only encourage the promotion of resources supported by empirical evidence, but also encourage a deeper understanding of the SAL which shapes resource use.","PeriodicalId":44353,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Undergraduate students in large enrollment gateway courses like introductory biology are often inundated with different study resources to enhance their success on course exams. A good performance on these exams as measured by course grades is a strong determinant of their downstream success in the biology major and ultimately retention in STEM fields. Previous studies have suggested best-practices like pre-class reading guides or Supplemental Instruction. However, many of these studies do not also corroborate student course outcomes with Student Approaches to Learning (SAL). We investigated the association between specific resources and how they correlated with higher exam grades. We further investigated the degree to which SAL also correlated with student outcomes. We collected data over a span of two years from a large introductory biology course (N= 307) from a southeastern university by using a post-semester resource questionnaire. This questionnaire asked the students to describe the study resources they had utilized during the course of the semester and further assessed SAL via the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Our results indicate that students who earned a higher overall grade in the course were significantly more likely to self-report higher attendance in optional peer-led Supplemental Instruction meetings and, unexpectedly, were less likely to use pre-class reading guides. These students were more likely to report finding course material interesting, whereas students with lower overall final grades were more likely to report trying to memorize course material. However, we also found that students with higher course grades and high previous college GPAs also reported using rote memorization. Given that the efficacy of resources can vary based on the student, we not only encourage the promotion of resources supported by empirical evidence, but also encourage a deeper understanding of the SAL which shapes resource use.
哪些课程资源和学生的学习方法与生物学导论的高分有关?
在像入门生物学这样的大型招生门户课程中,本科生经常被不同的学习资源淹没,以提高他们在课程考试中的成绩。通过课程成绩来衡量,这些考试的良好表现是他们在生物专业取得成功并最终留在STEM领域的重要决定因素。之前的研究建议最好的做法是课前阅读指南或补充指导。然而,许多这些研究也没有证实学生的课程成果与学生的学习方法(SAL)。我们调查了特定资源之间的关系,以及它们如何与更高的考试成绩相关。我们进一步调查了SAL与学生成绩的相关程度。我们从一所东南大学的一门大型生物学入门课程(N= 307)中收集了两年多的数据,使用了学期后的资源问卷。该问卷要求学生描述他们在本学期课程中使用的学习资源,并通过修订学习过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F)进一步评估SAL。我们的研究结果表明,在课程中获得更高总分的学生更有可能在可选的同伴主导的补充指导会议上自我报告更高的出勤率,出乎意料的是,他们更不可能使用课前阅读指南。这些学生更有可能发现课程材料很有趣,而总体期末成绩较低的学生更有可能试图记住课程材料。然而,我们也发现,那些课程成绩较高和以前大学gpa较高的学生也使用死记硬背。鉴于资源的有效性可能因学生而异,我们不仅鼓励推广有经验证据支持的资源,而且鼓励对影响资源使用的SAL有更深入的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The editorial policy of'' the African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AJRMSTE) is to disseminate, as widely as possible, high quality research findings and well written articles on Curriculum Studies; Teacher Education; Education for Development; Mathematics Education; Science Education; Design & Technology Education and Computer Education. Articles that promote the understanding of curricular policy and diverse socio-cultural issues and those which stimulate epistemological and methodological debates are welcome. The editorial board welcomes articles that will contribute to the overall development of science, mathematics, technology and environmental education in Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信