Are Formal Rules Sufficient to Counteract the Burden of History? Racial Inequality and the Historical Evolution of Formal Educational Rules in Brazil

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ariana Britto, Roberta Costa, Fábio Waltenberg
{"title":"Are Formal Rules Sufficient to Counteract the Burden of History? Racial Inequality and the Historical Evolution of Formal Educational Rules in Brazil","authors":"Ariana Britto, Roberta Costa, Fábio Waltenberg","doi":"10.1086/726615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the issue of racial inequality in Brazil, specifically within the education system. We present statistical data highlighting the disparities between White and Black students regarding illiteracy rates, school attendance, and learning outcomes. We argue that traditional economic frameworks have difficulty incorporating racial issues in their analyses of inequality and call for increased academic research on the subject. Our discussion shows that these disparities are perpetuated by cyclical and historical processes that produce and reproduce various forms of racism. We also introduce the concept of “racial rules” to understand better how formal and informal rules have been institutionalized and employed to promote or hinder racial equity. The article outlines a typology of racial rules, including exclusionary, inclusionary, and nonrules, and uses it to analyze the historical evolution of public education policies in Brazil. To illustrate how formal educational rules perpetuate conditions of stagnation for the Black population in education, the article examines two periods in Brazilian history.","PeriodicalId":51506,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of racial inequality in Brazil, specifically within the education system. We present statistical data highlighting the disparities between White and Black students regarding illiteracy rates, school attendance, and learning outcomes. We argue that traditional economic frameworks have difficulty incorporating racial issues in their analyses of inequality and call for increased academic research on the subject. Our discussion shows that these disparities are perpetuated by cyclical and historical processes that produce and reproduce various forms of racism. We also introduce the concept of “racial rules” to understand better how formal and informal rules have been institutionalized and employed to promote or hinder racial equity. The article outlines a typology of racial rules, including exclusionary, inclusionary, and nonrules, and uses it to analyze the historical evolution of public education policies in Brazil. To illustrate how formal educational rules perpetuate conditions of stagnation for the Black population in education, the article examines two periods in Brazilian history.
形式规则足以抵消历史的负担吗?种族不平等与巴西正规教育制度的历史演变
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Education Review
Comparative Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Comparative Education Review investigates education throughout the world and the social, economic, and political forces that shape it. Founded in 1957 to advance knowledge and teaching in comparative education studies, the Review has since established itself as the most reliable source for the analysis of the place of education in countries other than the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信