Low value and hard to stack: Opportunity zones and the low-income housing tax credit

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Michael Snidal, Tyler Haupert, Guanglai Li
{"title":"Low value and hard to stack: Opportunity zones and the low-income housing tax credit","authors":"Michael Snidal, Tyler Haupert, Guanglai Li","doi":"10.1080/07352166.2023.2245076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Established in 2017, Opportunity Zones (OZs) promised to spur investment in undercapitalized communities. Early evaluations find that OZs have had nominal effects on employment and real estate outcomes. Distressed community development, however, has historically been driven by affordable housing production. Conceptually, developers can stack OZs with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the nation’s largest program for affordable housing. Therefore, this study seeks to estimate whether OZs have increased affordable housing production. First, we scan press announcements and OZ-tracking websites through July 2022 to document evidence of OZ-financed affordable housing. Second, we use a difference-in-differences approach to compare LIHTC outcomes through 2018 in OZs with areas that were OZ-eligible but not designated. We find only 60 examples of OZs supporting affordable housing projects across the country. We also find that OZs do not have statistically significant effects on LIHTC outcomes. We document findings from 16 interviews conducted in 2019 and 2020 to contextualize why OZs are failing to stimulate affordable housing production. In conclusion, we discuss how OZs could be modified to better encourage affordable housing, but we also reflect on whether such modifications would be desirable for goals of efficiency and distressed community development.","PeriodicalId":17420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2245076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Established in 2017, Opportunity Zones (OZs) promised to spur investment in undercapitalized communities. Early evaluations find that OZs have had nominal effects on employment and real estate outcomes. Distressed community development, however, has historically been driven by affordable housing production. Conceptually, developers can stack OZs with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the nation’s largest program for affordable housing. Therefore, this study seeks to estimate whether OZs have increased affordable housing production. First, we scan press announcements and OZ-tracking websites through July 2022 to document evidence of OZ-financed affordable housing. Second, we use a difference-in-differences approach to compare LIHTC outcomes through 2018 in OZs with areas that were OZ-eligible but not designated. We find only 60 examples of OZs supporting affordable housing projects across the country. We also find that OZs do not have statistically significant effects on LIHTC outcomes. We document findings from 16 interviews conducted in 2019 and 2020 to contextualize why OZs are failing to stimulate affordable housing production. In conclusion, we discuss how OZs could be modified to better encourage affordable housing, but we also reflect on whether such modifications would be desirable for goals of efficiency and distressed community development.
低价值和难以堆叠:机会区和低收入住房税收抵免
机会区(OZs)成立于2017年,承诺刺激资本不足社区的投资。早期的评估发现,臭氧臭氧区对就业和房地产结果产生了名义上的影响。然而,从历史上看,贫困社区的发展一直是由经济适用房的生产推动的。从概念上讲,开发商可以将OZs与低收入住房税收抵免(LIHTC)相结合,这是美国最大的经济适用房计划。因此,本研究试图估计OZs是否增加了经济适用房的生产。首先,我们扫描2022年7月之前的新闻公告和ozz跟踪网站,以记录ozz资助的经济适用房的证据。其次,我们使用差异中的差异方法来比较2018年臭氧区与符合臭氧区条件但未指定的区域的LIHTC结果。我们在全国范围内只发现了60个OZs支持经济适用房项目的例子。我们还发现OZs对LIHTC结局没有统计学上显著的影响。我们记录了2019年和2020年进行的16次访谈的结果,以了解OZs未能刺激经济适用房生产的原因。总之,我们讨论了如何修改OZs以更好地鼓励经济适用房,但我们也反思了这种修改是否适合效率和贫困社区发展的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Affairs
Journal of Urban Affairs URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Focusing on urban research and policy analysis, the Journal of Urban Affairs is among the most widely cited journals in the field. Published for the Urban Affairs Association, the journal offers multidisciplinary perspectives and explores issues of relevance to both scholars and practitioners, including: - Theoretical, conceptual, or methodological approaches to metropolitan and community problems - Empirical research that advances the understanding of society - Strategies for social change in the urban milieu - Innovative urban policies and programs - Issues of current interest to those who work in the field and those who study the urban and regional environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信