Toward a holistic vision on the nature of science in science curricula: an investigation of primary and middle school curricula in Turkey

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gözde Kurt, Ebru Kaya
{"title":"Toward a holistic vision on the nature of science in science curricula: an investigation of primary and middle school curricula in Turkey","authors":"Gözde Kurt, Ebru Kaya","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2023.2262400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Nature of Science (NOS) is a significant research area as well as a curriculum theme in science education. Although many analyses of science curricula and their coverage of NOS exist, there are limited accounts of science curricula that take a broad and holistic vision on NOS. A recent framework called the ‘Reconceptualised Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science (RFN)’ provides such a broad account and covers the cognitive-epistemic and social-institutional systems of science. The cognitive-epistemic system consists of ‘aims and values’, ‘methods and methodological rules’, ‘scientific practices’, and ‘scientific knowledge’ while the social-institutional system consists of ‘professional activities’, ‘social certification and dissemination’, ‘social values’, ‘scientific ethos’, ‘social organizations and interactions’, ‘financial systems’, and ‘political power structures’.Purpose The empirical study reported in the paper aims to investigate the inclusion of NOS in the Turkish science curriculum by using the RFN.Design and Methods Turkish science curriculum used at primary and middle school levels were analyzed by content analysis.Findings The results suggest that the Turkish science curriculum emphasizes the cognitive-epistemic categories more than the social-institutional categories. The dominating RFN category in the science curriculum is scientific practices while the reference to political power structures is limited.Conclusion The paper contributes to understanding of how Turkish science curriculum covers NOS, and it has implications for international science curricula reform for an inclusive account of NOS that is likely to enhance science learning.KEYWORDS: Nature of sciencereconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of sciencescience curriculumcontent analysis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2262400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground Nature of Science (NOS) is a significant research area as well as a curriculum theme in science education. Although many analyses of science curricula and their coverage of NOS exist, there are limited accounts of science curricula that take a broad and holistic vision on NOS. A recent framework called the ‘Reconceptualised Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science (RFN)’ provides such a broad account and covers the cognitive-epistemic and social-institutional systems of science. The cognitive-epistemic system consists of ‘aims and values’, ‘methods and methodological rules’, ‘scientific practices’, and ‘scientific knowledge’ while the social-institutional system consists of ‘professional activities’, ‘social certification and dissemination’, ‘social values’, ‘scientific ethos’, ‘social organizations and interactions’, ‘financial systems’, and ‘political power structures’.Purpose The empirical study reported in the paper aims to investigate the inclusion of NOS in the Turkish science curriculum by using the RFN.Design and Methods Turkish science curriculum used at primary and middle school levels were analyzed by content analysis.Findings The results suggest that the Turkish science curriculum emphasizes the cognitive-epistemic categories more than the social-institutional categories. The dominating RFN category in the science curriculum is scientific practices while the reference to political power structures is limited.Conclusion The paper contributes to understanding of how Turkish science curriculum covers NOS, and it has implications for international science curricula reform for an inclusive account of NOS that is likely to enhance science learning.KEYWORDS: Nature of sciencereconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of sciencescience curriculumcontent analysis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
朝向科学课程中科学本质的整体视野:对土耳其中小学课程的调查
摘要科学的背景性质(background Nature of Science, NOS)是科学教育的一个重要研究领域,也是一个课程主题。尽管存在许多对科学课程及其覆盖范围的分析,但对NOS采取广泛和整体视野的科学课程的描述有限。最近一个名为“科学本质的重新概念化家族相似性方法(RFN)”的框架提供了这样一个广泛的描述,涵盖了科学的认知-认识和社会-制度系统。认知-认识系统由“目标与价值”、“方法与方法论规则”、“科学实践”和“科学知识”组成,而社会-制度系统则由“专业活动”、“社会认证与传播”、“社会价值”、“科学精神”、“社会组织与互动”、“金融系统”和“政治权力结构”组成。本文的实证研究旨在通过使用RFN来调查NOS在土耳其科学课程中的纳入情况。设计与方法采用内容分析法对土耳其中小学科学课程进行分析。结果表明,土耳其科学课程更强调认知-知识范畴,而不是社会-制度范畴。科学课程中以科学实践为主导,对政治权力结构的提及有限。本文有助于理解土耳其科学课程如何涵盖NOS,并对国际科学课程改革具有启示意义,因为它对NOS的包容性解释可能会加强科学学习。关键词:科学本质;科学本质的概念化家族相似性方法;科学课程内容分析;披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信