The Christian concept of forgiveness and religious education facing the problem of individualism

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jarosław Horowski
{"title":"The Christian concept of forgiveness and religious education facing the problem of individualism","authors":"Jarosław Horowski","doi":"10.1080/01416200.2023.2262773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe analysis undertaken in this article pertain to the challenge faced by education, which consists of overcoming the negative aspects of contemporary individualism, such as the building of instrumental relationships by people maturing in a culture permeated with it. Consequently, there is limited responsibility taken for the other people co-creating these relationships. The author puts forward the thesis that the Christian concept of forgiveness is an appropriate point of reference for reflection on the nature of interpersonal relationships and the issue of responsibility for other people, even when they are weak and their behaviour is the cause of disappointment and regret. The main part of the analysis was devoted to understanding forgiveness, which is the essence of the Christian attitude and, at the same time, the subject of many controversies. However, from the analysis of excerpts from the Bible, it was concluded that the often-raised doubts about the moral value of forgiveness are a consequence of identifying God’s forgiveness with decisions made by people and an erroneous understanding of the relationship between forgiveness and repentance. The dispelling of these doubts was a premise for the statement that it can become the basis of contemporary social and moral education.KEYWORDS: Christianityindividualismresponsibilityforgiveness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The heroes of the Greek novels are not perceived as offending the gods, so they don’t need to show repentance, conversion and beseech forgiveness (Konstan Citation2010).2. In Christianity, the incarnation, passion and death of Christ on the cross are understood as the greatest expressions of God’s love for people (Martini Citation2019), but this topic is deliberately omitted because it would require a broader theological interpretation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJarosław HorowskiDr. hab. Jarosław Horowski is an associate professor in Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Institute of Education Sciences, editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Paedagogia Christiana. Author of Moral Education According to neo-Thomistic Pedagogy (in Polish, WN UMK, 2015). Interested in philosophy of education, moral and religious education, neo-Thomistic notion in pedagogy, education for moral virtues, and education for forgiveness.","PeriodicalId":46368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Religious Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2262773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe analysis undertaken in this article pertain to the challenge faced by education, which consists of overcoming the negative aspects of contemporary individualism, such as the building of instrumental relationships by people maturing in a culture permeated with it. Consequently, there is limited responsibility taken for the other people co-creating these relationships. The author puts forward the thesis that the Christian concept of forgiveness is an appropriate point of reference for reflection on the nature of interpersonal relationships and the issue of responsibility for other people, even when they are weak and their behaviour is the cause of disappointment and regret. The main part of the analysis was devoted to understanding forgiveness, which is the essence of the Christian attitude and, at the same time, the subject of many controversies. However, from the analysis of excerpts from the Bible, it was concluded that the often-raised doubts about the moral value of forgiveness are a consequence of identifying God’s forgiveness with decisions made by people and an erroneous understanding of the relationship between forgiveness and repentance. The dispelling of these doubts was a premise for the statement that it can become the basis of contemporary social and moral education.KEYWORDS: Christianityindividualismresponsibilityforgiveness Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The heroes of the Greek novels are not perceived as offending the gods, so they don’t need to show repentance, conversion and beseech forgiveness (Konstan Citation2010).2. In Christianity, the incarnation, passion and death of Christ on the cross are understood as the greatest expressions of God’s love for people (Martini Citation2019), but this topic is deliberately omitted because it would require a broader theological interpretation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJarosław HorowskiDr. hab. Jarosław Horowski is an associate professor in Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Institute of Education Sciences, editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Paedagogia Christiana. Author of Moral Education According to neo-Thomistic Pedagogy (in Polish, WN UMK, 2015). Interested in philosophy of education, moral and religious education, neo-Thomistic notion in pedagogy, education for moral virtues, and education for forgiveness.
基督教宽恕观与宗教教育面临的个人主义问题
摘要本文分析了教育面临的挑战,即克服当代个人主义的消极方面,如在充满个人主义的文化中成长起来的人们建立工具性关系。因此,共同创建这些关系的其他人所承担的责任有限。作者提出的论点是,基督教的宽恕概念是反思人际关系的本质和对他人的责任问题的适当参考点,即使他们是软弱的,他们的行为是失望和遗憾的原因。分析的主要部分致力于理解宽恕,这是基督教态度的本质,同时也是许多争议的主题。然而,通过对《圣经》节选的分析,我们得出结论,人们经常对宽恕的道德价值产生怀疑,这是将上帝的宽恕与人们的决定等同起来的结果,也是对宽恕与悔改之间关系的错误理解的结果。消除这些疑虑是它可以成为当代社会和道德教育基础的前提。关键词:基督教;个人主义;责任;宽恕披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。希腊小说中的英雄不被认为冒犯了神,所以他们不需要表现出忏悔、皈依和乞求宽恕(Konstan Citation2010)。在基督教中,基督在十字架上的化身、受难和死亡被理解为上帝对人类爱的最伟大表达(Martini Citation2019),但这个话题被故意省略,因为它需要更广泛的神学解释。关于contributorsJarosław HorowskiDr的说明。想吃汉堡。Jarosław霍罗夫斯基是托卢奇尼古拉斯·哥白尼大学哲学与社会科学学院的副教授,教育科学研究所,科学杂志《Paedagogia Christiana》的主编。《新托马斯主义教育学的道德教育》(波兰文,WN UMK, 2015)作者。对教育哲学、道德和宗教教育、教育学中的新托马斯主义观念、道德美德教育和宽恕教育感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Religious Education (BJRE) is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a pedigree stretching back to 1934 when it began life as Religion in Education. In 1961 the title was changed to Learning for Living, and the present title was adopted in 1978. It is the leading journal in Britain for the dissemination of international research in religion and education and for the scholarly discussion of issues concerning religion and education internationally. The British Journal of Religious Education promotes research which contributes to our understanding of the relationship between religion and education in all phases of formal and non-formal educational settings. BJRE publishes articles which are national, international and transnational in scope from researchers working in any discipline whose work informs debate in religious education. Topics might include religious education policy curriculum and pedagogy, research on religion and young people, or the influence of religion(s) and non-religious worldviews upon the educational process as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信