Influence of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling on Portuguese Consumers’ Food Preferences - a Preliminary Study

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Joana Marcos, Duarte Gomes, M. Lídia Palma, M. João Cebola, Paula Pereira, Marisa Nicolai, Raquel Carriço
{"title":"Influence of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling on Portuguese Consumers’ Food Preferences - a Preliminary Study","authors":"Joana Marcos, Duarte Gomes, M. Lídia Palma, M. João Cebola, Paula Pereira, Marisa Nicolai, Raquel Carriço","doi":"10.22259/2637-5583.0601002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Nutrition labelling, as a way of communication between consumers and the food industry, allows them to make more conscious, informed and safe choices when purchasing food products. Simplified nutrition labelling systems are considered one of the best tools for the promotion of healthy eating habits. Aim: This cross-sectional descriptive study aims to evaluate the use of the front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling in the food choices of Portuguese consumers, as a complement to the Nutritional Declaration, through an online survey. Methods: The total sample consists of 120 Portuguese individuals, aged between 18-55 years. Data was collected during the January of 2022. Socio-demographic data, knowledge about food labelling and knowledge about FOP nutrition labelling systems (Nutrition Traffic Light and Nutri-Score) were collected. Results: The results highlight a statistically significant association between gender and the choice to read food labels (p=0.004) and reveal that information expressed on nutrition labels affects consumers’ decision (p=0.015), both at the time of purchase. FOP system (p=0.014) as well as location (p=0.010) was preferred to traditional Nutrition Declaration, regarding food label reading. The interest in the product’s nutritional value appears to be the main significant motive for influencing label reading (p=0.021). No other statistical relevance was found. Conclusion: To sum up, when purchasing, the information, location and design of nutrition labels tends to affect consumers’ decisions. Thus, food education campaigns amongst the population are necessary to minimize nutritional literacy gaps. However, future studies are needed to assess the impact of the Nutri-Score system on consumers’ food choices. Keywords: Nutrition Labelling, Simplified Nutrition Labelling Systems, Front-of-Pack (Fop), Consumers, Food Choices.","PeriodicalId":16096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food and Nutrition Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22259/2637-5583.0601002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: Nutrition labelling, as a way of communication between consumers and the food industry, allows them to make more conscious, informed and safe choices when purchasing food products. Simplified nutrition labelling systems are considered one of the best tools for the promotion of healthy eating habits. Aim: This cross-sectional descriptive study aims to evaluate the use of the front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling in the food choices of Portuguese consumers, as a complement to the Nutritional Declaration, through an online survey. Methods: The total sample consists of 120 Portuguese individuals, aged between 18-55 years. Data was collected during the January of 2022. Socio-demographic data, knowledge about food labelling and knowledge about FOP nutrition labelling systems (Nutrition Traffic Light and Nutri-Score) were collected. Results: The results highlight a statistically significant association between gender and the choice to read food labels (p=0.004) and reveal that information expressed on nutrition labels affects consumers’ decision (p=0.015), both at the time of purchase. FOP system (p=0.014) as well as location (p=0.010) was preferred to traditional Nutrition Declaration, regarding food label reading. The interest in the product’s nutritional value appears to be the main significant motive for influencing label reading (p=0.021). No other statistical relevance was found. Conclusion: To sum up, when purchasing, the information, location and design of nutrition labels tends to affect consumers’ decisions. Thus, food education campaigns amongst the population are necessary to minimize nutritional literacy gaps. However, future studies are needed to assess the impact of the Nutri-Score system on consumers’ food choices. Keywords: Nutrition Labelling, Simplified Nutrition Labelling Systems, Front-of-Pack (Fop), Consumers, Food Choices.
包装正面营养标签对葡萄牙消费者食物偏好影响的初步研究
背景:营养标签作为消费者和食品行业之间的一种沟通方式,可以让消费者在购买食品时做出更有意识、更知情和更安全的选择。简化的营养标签制度被认为是促进健康饮食习惯的最佳工具之一。目的:本横断面描述性研究旨在通过在线调查评估葡萄牙消费者在食品选择中使用包装正面(FOP)营养标签,作为营养宣言的补充。方法:总样本包括120名葡萄牙人,年龄在18-55岁之间。数据收集于2022年1月。收集了社会人口统计数据、食品标签知识和FOP营养标签系统(营养红绿灯和营养评分)知识。结果:结果突出了性别与选择阅读食品标签之间的统计显著关联(p=0.004),并揭示了营养标签上表达的信息影响消费者的决定(p=0.015),无论是在购买时。在食品标签阅读方面,FOP系统(p=0.014)和位置(p=0.010)优于传统的营养声明。对产品营养价值的兴趣似乎是影响标签阅读的主要重要动机(p=0.021)。未发现其他统计学相关性。综上所述,在购买时,营养标签的信息、位置和设计往往会影响消费者的决定。因此,有必要在人口中开展食品教育活动,以尽量减少营养素养差距。然而,需要进一步的研究来评估营养评分系统对消费者食物选择的影响。关键词:营养标签,简化营养标签系统,包装正面,消费者,食品选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Food and Nutrition Research (JFNR) publishes papers focusing on fundamental and applied research in chemistry, physics, microbiology, nutrition aspects, bioactivity, quality, safety, and technology of foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信