Soohyun Park, Seung-Pyo Jun, Chul Lee, Hyoung Sun Yoo
{"title":"The interaction effect of absorptive capacity and partner types on product innovation in SMEs","authors":"Soohyun Park, Seung-Pyo Jun, Chul Lee, Hyoung Sun Yoo","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2023.2261891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper aims to examine the relationship between absorptive capacity (ACAP) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their external partner types for successful product innovation. There has been little empirical research regarding the synergy between SMEs’ internal capabilities and partner types in collaborative R&D projects. We developed and tested an integrated model from the knowledge- and resource-based views to explain the substantial disparities in payoff of collaborative R&D projects that exist between firms. Our study of 2,360 government-funded R&D projects in South Korea found that the direct effect of ACAP and interactions with science-based partners had a positive effect on product innovation success, whereas interactions with market-based partners had no significant effect. Our findings provide meaningful evidence for SMEs and policymakers who have to decide between R&D partners for their innovation strategy.KEYWORDS: Open innovation in SMEsabsorptive capacityexternal partner typeR&D project-level AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information under Grant [K-22-L03-C03-S01].Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information [K-22-L03-C03-S01, K-23-L03-C03-S01].","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2261891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper aims to examine the relationship between absorptive capacity (ACAP) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their external partner types for successful product innovation. There has been little empirical research regarding the synergy between SMEs’ internal capabilities and partner types in collaborative R&D projects. We developed and tested an integrated model from the knowledge- and resource-based views to explain the substantial disparities in payoff of collaborative R&D projects that exist between firms. Our study of 2,360 government-funded R&D projects in South Korea found that the direct effect of ACAP and interactions with science-based partners had a positive effect on product innovation success, whereas interactions with market-based partners had no significant effect. Our findings provide meaningful evidence for SMEs and policymakers who have to decide between R&D partners for their innovation strategy.KEYWORDS: Open innovation in SMEsabsorptive capacityexternal partner typeR&D project-level AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information under Grant [K-22-L03-C03-S01].Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information [K-22-L03-C03-S01, K-23-L03-C03-S01].
期刊介绍:
Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.