Consumer Valuation of European Certification Labels on Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Assessing the Impact of Multiple Labels and Consumer Heterogeneity

IF 3.6 Q2 BUSINESS
Georgia S. Papoutsi
{"title":"Consumer Valuation of European Certification Labels on Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Assessing the Impact of Multiple Labels and Consumer Heterogeneity","authors":"Georgia S. Papoutsi","doi":"10.1080/10454446.2023.2276182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMultiple food certification labels are a significant trend in food marketing, yet their impact on consumer decisions remains insufficiently understood. This study used a choice experiment to assess consumer valuation of European organic and Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) labels on extra virgin olive oil, considering consumer heterogeneity. The data were analyzed using a willingness-to-pay-space model and a binary probit analysis. Results indicate positive valuation of both labels when presented individually, with a higher premium price for organic farming (2.16€/L) than PDO (1.79€/L). The introduction of multiple labels reveals the presence of a sub-additivity effect and leads to the emergence of distinct consumer segments. The majority displays a negative willingness to pay, indicating strong substitution effects, while a minority perceives the labels as complementary. Moreover, some consumers are willing to pay a premium price for one label, but adding a second label undermines the effectiveness of the individual label.KEYWORDS: Multiple labelingorganic certificationProtected designation of origin (PDO) certificationchoice experimentwillingness-to-pay-space AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Dr. Vincenzina Caputo for her valuable assistance with Bayesian design, Dr. Achilleas Vassilopoulos for his comments on the choice model results, and Dr. Constantine Iliopoulos for language editing. Also, the author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments.Disclosure statementThe author declares that she has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Data availability statementData will be made available on request.Notes1 It was chosen PDO over PGI because PDO certification is prevalent among Greek products according to the official European database of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wine, and spirit drinks that are registered and protected across the EU for their geographical indications. Specifically, 69% of the certified products in Greece are protected for the designation of origin and in the specific case of olive oil, 63% of the certified olive oils has a PDO certification. Furthermore, results from the in-depth interviews revealed that Greek consumers recognize more the PDO certification than the PGI. Literature confirms that Italian olive oil consumers (who reveal similarities in food consumption with Greek consumers due to the fact that olive oil is part of the traditional diet for both countries) are willing to pay more for PDO than PGI label (Aprile et al., Citation2012; Menapace et al., Citation2011).2 Removing brand influences from the choices, can make respondents focus the tradeoffs upon the attributes’ levels.3 According to Louviere and Street (Citation2000), in order to make the choice experiment more comparable to real food shopping situations, consumers must have the opportunity to decide not to buy any item.4 Since the introduction of “cheap talk” script by (Cummings & Taylor, Citation1999), several studies have used it as a way to minimize hypothetical bias in online surveys (Carlsson & Kataria, Citation2008; Tonsor & Shupp, Citation2011; Van Loo et al., Citation2011).","PeriodicalId":15827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2023.2276182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTMultiple food certification labels are a significant trend in food marketing, yet their impact on consumer decisions remains insufficiently understood. This study used a choice experiment to assess consumer valuation of European organic and Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) labels on extra virgin olive oil, considering consumer heterogeneity. The data were analyzed using a willingness-to-pay-space model and a binary probit analysis. Results indicate positive valuation of both labels when presented individually, with a higher premium price for organic farming (2.16€/L) than PDO (1.79€/L). The introduction of multiple labels reveals the presence of a sub-additivity effect and leads to the emergence of distinct consumer segments. The majority displays a negative willingness to pay, indicating strong substitution effects, while a minority perceives the labels as complementary. Moreover, some consumers are willing to pay a premium price for one label, but adding a second label undermines the effectiveness of the individual label.KEYWORDS: Multiple labelingorganic certificationProtected designation of origin (PDO) certificationchoice experimentwillingness-to-pay-space AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Dr. Vincenzina Caputo for her valuable assistance with Bayesian design, Dr. Achilleas Vassilopoulos for his comments on the choice model results, and Dr. Constantine Iliopoulos for language editing. Also, the author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments.Disclosure statementThe author declares that she has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Data availability statementData will be made available on request.Notes1 It was chosen PDO over PGI because PDO certification is prevalent among Greek products according to the official European database of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wine, and spirit drinks that are registered and protected across the EU for their geographical indications. Specifically, 69% of the certified products in Greece are protected for the designation of origin and in the specific case of olive oil, 63% of the certified olive oils has a PDO certification. Furthermore, results from the in-depth interviews revealed that Greek consumers recognize more the PDO certification than the PGI. Literature confirms that Italian olive oil consumers (who reveal similarities in food consumption with Greek consumers due to the fact that olive oil is part of the traditional diet for both countries) are willing to pay more for PDO than PGI label (Aprile et al., Citation2012; Menapace et al., Citation2011).2 Removing brand influences from the choices, can make respondents focus the tradeoffs upon the attributes’ levels.3 According to Louviere and Street (Citation2000), in order to make the choice experiment more comparable to real food shopping situations, consumers must have the opportunity to decide not to buy any item.4 Since the introduction of “cheap talk” script by (Cummings & Taylor, Citation1999), several studies have used it as a way to minimize hypothetical bias in online surveys (Carlsson & Kataria, Citation2008; Tonsor & Shupp, Citation2011; Van Loo et al., Citation2011).
消费者对特级初榨橄榄油欧洲认证标签的评价:评估多重标签和消费者异质性的影响
摘要多种食品认证标签是食品营销的重要趋势,但其对消费者决策的影响仍未得到充分认识。考虑到消费者的异质性,本研究采用选择实验来评估消费者对特级初榨橄榄油的欧洲有机和原产地保护标识(PDO)标签的评价。使用付费空间意愿模型和二元概率分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,当单独呈现时,这两个标签的价值都是积极的,有机农业的溢价(2.16欧元/升)高于PDO(1.79欧元/升)。多重标签的引入揭示了亚可加性效应的存在,并导致了不同消费群体的出现。大多数人表现出消极的支付意愿,表明强烈的替代效应,而少数人认为标签是互补的。此外,一些消费者愿意为一个标签支付更高的价格,但增加第二个标签会削弱单个标签的有效性。关键词:多重标签有机认证受保护的原产地标识(PDO)认证选择实验支付空间意愿致谢作者要感谢Vincenzina Caputo博士在贝叶斯设计方面的宝贵帮助,Achilleas Vassilopoulos博士对选择模型结果的评论,以及Constantine Iliopoulos博士的语言编辑。同时,感谢匿名审稿人提出的宝贵建议和意见。披露声明作者声明,她没有已知的竞争经济利益或个人关系,可能会影响本文所报道的工作。数据可用性声明数据可应要求提供。注1之所以选择PDO而不是PGI,是因为PDO认证在希腊产品中很普遍,根据欧洲农产品和食品、葡萄酒和烈酒的官方数据库,这些产品在欧盟范围内注册和保护其地理标志。具体来说,希腊69%的认证产品受到原产地指定的保护,在橄榄油的具体情况下,63%的认证橄榄油有PDO认证。此外,深度访谈的结果显示,希腊消费者对PDO认证的认可程度高于PGI。文献证实,意大利橄榄油消费者(由于橄榄油是两国传统饮食的一部分,他们揭示了与希腊消费者在食品消费方面的相似之处)愿意为PDO支付比PGI标签更高的价格(Aprile等人,Citation2012;Menapace et al., Citation2011)从选择中去除品牌影响,可以使受访者将权衡集中在属性的层面上根据Louviere和Street (Citation2000)的观点,为了使选择实验更接近真实的食品购物情况,消费者必须有机会决定不购买任何商品自从卡明斯和泰勒(Cummings & Taylor, Citation1999)引入“廉价谈话”脚本以来,一些研究将其作为一种减少在线调查中假设偏差的方法(Carlsson & Kataria, Citation2008;Tonsor & Shupp, Citation2011;Van Loo et al., Citation2011)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: From food promotion and advertising through new food product development and consumer behavior research, the Journal of Food Products Marketing provides timely, practical articles that keep food marketers on the cutting edge of their profession. The journal includes refereed research studies as well as opinions, guidelines, and speeches by practitioners that contribute to the better practice and understanding of food marketing. The journal provides a single forum for both food marketing academicians and food marketing practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信