Governing early childhood education and care quality development among diverse private ECEC providers in Norway

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anne Sigrid Haugset, Håkon Finne
{"title":"Governing early childhood education and care quality development among diverse private ECEC providers in Norway","authors":"Anne Sigrid Haugset, Håkon Finne","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2023.2280291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article sheds light on governance mechanisms at work when decentralised implementation of national educational and welfare policies encounters a heterogeneous sector of private service provider organisations. It illuminates how isomorphic pressure plays out at the interface between local governance and private providers’ organisational strategies for quality development in early childhood education and care (ECEC). Key informant interviews are employed to investigate the function of local non-mandatory quality and competence-developing networks (QCDNs) as a locus for these interactions. Findings indicate that QCDNs contribute to shaping private ECEC providers’ quality development efforts, and that coercive, normative, and mimetic isomorphic pressures become intertwined in this process. Most private provider organisations choose to participate in these non-mandatory networks. However, ECEC corporations and small private providers assign different meanings to their participation, and the networks thus appear to spur different organisational strategies. While small private providers harmoniously align their ECEC quality development strategies with institutionalised municipal practice, the provider corporations, while in formal compliance, exploit the resulting inter-municipal variation as one argument among many for more stringent national governmental standardisation. We demonstrate how isomorphic pressure may create and enable an impetus for endogenous and gradual institutional change agency.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2280291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article sheds light on governance mechanisms at work when decentralised implementation of national educational and welfare policies encounters a heterogeneous sector of private service provider organisations. It illuminates how isomorphic pressure plays out at the interface between local governance and private providers’ organisational strategies for quality development in early childhood education and care (ECEC). Key informant interviews are employed to investigate the function of local non-mandatory quality and competence-developing networks (QCDNs) as a locus for these interactions. Findings indicate that QCDNs contribute to shaping private ECEC providers’ quality development efforts, and that coercive, normative, and mimetic isomorphic pressures become intertwined in this process. Most private provider organisations choose to participate in these non-mandatory networks. However, ECEC corporations and small private providers assign different meanings to their participation, and the networks thus appear to spur different organisational strategies. While small private providers harmoniously align their ECEC quality development strategies with institutionalised municipal practice, the provider corporations, while in formal compliance, exploit the resulting inter-municipal variation as one argument among many for more stringent national governmental standardisation. We demonstrate how isomorphic pressure may create and enable an impetus for endogenous and gradual institutional change agency.
管理挪威不同私人ECEC提供者的幼儿教育和护理质量发展
本文揭示了当国家教育和福利政策的分散实施遇到私人服务提供商组织的异质部门时,治理机制的作用。它阐明了在幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)质量发展的地方治理和私人提供者的组织战略之间的界面上,同构压力是如何发挥作用的。本文采用关键信息提供者访谈的方式来调查本地非强制性质量和能力发展网络(qcdn)作为这些相互作用轨迹的功能。研究结果表明,qcdn有助于塑造私营ECEC提供商的质量发展努力,在这一过程中,强制性、规范性和模仿同构压力相互交织。大多数私人医疗机构选择参与这些非强制性网络。然而,ECEC公司和小型私人供应商对其参与赋予了不同的意义,因此网络似乎刺激了不同的组织战略。虽然小型私人供应商将其ECEC质量发展战略与制度化的市政实践协调一致,但供应商公司在正式遵守规定的同时,利用由此产生的城市间差异作为许多更严格的国家政府标准化的论据之一。我们展示了同构压力如何创造和实现内生的渐进制度变革机构的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信