Learning Orientations in Interfaith Initiatives: A Case Study of the Interfaith Leadership Program Emoena

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Hannah J. Visser, Marianne Moyaert, Gerdien D. Bertram-Troost, Anke I. Liefbroer
{"title":"Learning Orientations in Interfaith Initiatives: A Case Study of the Interfaith Leadership Program Emoena","authors":"Hannah J. Visser, Marianne Moyaert, Gerdien D. Bertram-Troost, Anke I. Liefbroer","doi":"10.1080/00344087.2023.2261754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines participants’ self-reported learning orientations over the course of the interfaith leadership program Emoena. Participants started the program with a range of different expectations and motivations, and this influenced the insights they gained and the challenges they faced throughout the program. Based on an inductive analysis of participants’ reflection reports, four interfaith learning orientations were distinguished: 1) literacy-oriented learning, 2) connection-oriented learning, 3) competency-oriented learning, and 4) reflection-oriented learning. Knowing more about these learning orientations will benefit curriculum designers in choosing relevant learning activities, and will direct future empirical work on the complex dynamics of interfaith learning.","PeriodicalId":45654,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGIOUS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2023.2261754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines participants’ self-reported learning orientations over the course of the interfaith leadership program Emoena. Participants started the program with a range of different expectations and motivations, and this influenced the insights they gained and the challenges they faced throughout the program. Based on an inductive analysis of participants’ reflection reports, four interfaith learning orientations were distinguished: 1) literacy-oriented learning, 2) connection-oriented learning, 3) competency-oriented learning, and 4) reflection-oriented learning. Knowing more about these learning orientations will benefit curriculum designers in choosing relevant learning activities, and will direct future empirical work on the complex dynamics of interfaith learning.
跨信仰倡议中的学习取向:以跨信仰领导项目Emoena为例
本研究考察了参与者在跨信仰领导项目Emoena过程中自我报告的学习取向。参与者带着一系列不同的期望和动机开始了这个项目,这影响了他们在整个项目中获得的见解和面临的挑战。通过对被试反思报告的归纳分析,我们区分出四种不同信仰间学习倾向:1)识字导向学习、2)连接导向学习、3)能力导向学习和4)反思导向学习。更多地了解这些学习取向将有利于课程设计者选择相关的学习活动,并将指导未来对不同信仰间学习的复杂动态的实证工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Religious Education, the journal of the Religious Education Association: An Association of Professors, Practitioners, and Researchers in Religious Education, offers an interfaith forum for exploring religious identity, formation, and education in faith communities, academic disciplines and institutions, and public life and the global community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信