The relationship of productivity-based wages to human rights and occupational justice – an exploratory study

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. M. Lysaght, N. Bobbette
{"title":"The relationship of productivity-based wages to human rights and occupational justice – an exploratory study","authors":"R. M. Lysaght, N. Bobbette","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2023.2249276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Productivity-based wage systems are intended to enhance the labour market participation of people with disabilities. Limited scholarship exists regarding the impact of such policies in practice. This qualitative study explored stakeholder perspectives on the Australian Supported Wage System (SWS), including perceptions of fairness and equity.Methods Document review provided context and background for the study. 14 semi-structured interviews were subsequently conducted with a range of stakeholders with knowledge of the SWS.Results Four primary themes were identified, related to assessment processes, value contributions of the system, practice risks and challenges, and ethical tensions.Conclusions The SWS appears to enhance worker choice and inclusion. A variety of factors may reduce the quality of these outcomes, however, and employment systems should support a range of evidence-informed approaches to ensure equitable employment outcomes.KEYWORDS: supported wageslabour market participationsocial inclusionoccupational justiceintellectual disability Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Intellectual disability is defined by the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia as a condition affecting intellectual skills and adaptive behaviours including the ability to learn, communicate, reason and retain information.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Association of Commonwealth Universities: [Grant Number 2018-199-141-008340].","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2023.2249276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground Productivity-based wage systems are intended to enhance the labour market participation of people with disabilities. Limited scholarship exists regarding the impact of such policies in practice. This qualitative study explored stakeholder perspectives on the Australian Supported Wage System (SWS), including perceptions of fairness and equity.Methods Document review provided context and background for the study. 14 semi-structured interviews were subsequently conducted with a range of stakeholders with knowledge of the SWS.Results Four primary themes were identified, related to assessment processes, value contributions of the system, practice risks and challenges, and ethical tensions.Conclusions The SWS appears to enhance worker choice and inclusion. A variety of factors may reduce the quality of these outcomes, however, and employment systems should support a range of evidence-informed approaches to ensure equitable employment outcomes.KEYWORDS: supported wageslabour market participationsocial inclusionoccupational justiceintellectual disability Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Intellectual disability is defined by the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia as a condition affecting intellectual skills and adaptive behaviours including the ability to learn, communicate, reason and retain information.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Association of Commonwealth Universities: [Grant Number 2018-199-141-008340].
基于生产率的工资与人权和职业正义的关系——一项探索性研究
摘要基于生产力的工资制度旨在提高残疾人在劳动力市场的参与度。关于这些政策在实践中的影响,存在的学术研究有限。本定性研究探讨了利益相关者对澳大利亚支持工资制度(SWS)的看法,包括对公平和公平的看法。方法查阅文献,为本研究提供背景资料。随后,我们与一系列了解社会福利制度的持份者进行了14次半结构化访谈。结果确定了四个主要主题,分别与评估过程、系统的价值贡献、实践风险和挑战以及伦理紧张关系有关。结论:SWS似乎增强了工人的选择和包容。然而,各种因素可能会降低这些结果的质量,就业系统应支持一系列循证方法,以确保公平的就业结果。关键词:支持性工资劳动市场参与社会包容职业公正智障披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划(NDIS)将智力残疾定义为影响智力技能和适应性行为的疾病,包括学习、沟通、推理和保留信息的能力。本研究由英联邦大学协会资助:[资助号:2018-199-141-008340]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信