THE INSTRUMENTAL MOTIVATION OF TEACHERS: IMPLICATIONS OF HIGH-STAKES ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kevin Proudfoot, Pete Boyd
{"title":"THE INSTRUMENTAL MOTIVATION OF TEACHERS: IMPLICATIONS OF HIGH-STAKES ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING","authors":"Kevin Proudfoot, Pete Boyd","doi":"10.1080/00071005.2023.2267657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the motivations of teachers to pursue ongoing professional learning. During recent decades, the international policy context has been characterised by high-stakes accountability, but the implications of this agenda for teachers’ motivations toward professional learning remains under-explored. In this mixed methods study, combining a large teacher survey and in-depth teacher interviews, a new and significant concept of ‘instrumental motivation’ is generated to capture how high-stakes performance management policies damage the motivation of teachers to learn professionally. This innovative approach, employing ordinal factor analysis and inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis inclusive of self-determination theory, reveals how the ‘instrumental motivation’ of teachers should be constrained and argues for the adoption of alternative motivational strategies to support effective professional learning in schools.","PeriodicalId":47509,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2023.2267657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the motivations of teachers to pursue ongoing professional learning. During recent decades, the international policy context has been characterised by high-stakes accountability, but the implications of this agenda for teachers’ motivations toward professional learning remains under-explored. In this mixed methods study, combining a large teacher survey and in-depth teacher interviews, a new and significant concept of ‘instrumental motivation’ is generated to capture how high-stakes performance management policies damage the motivation of teachers to learn professionally. This innovative approach, employing ordinal factor analysis and inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis inclusive of self-determination theory, reveals how the ‘instrumental motivation’ of teachers should be constrained and argues for the adoption of alternative motivational strategies to support effective professional learning in schools.
教师的工具性动机:高风险问责制对专业学习的影响
本文考虑了教师追求持续专业学习的动机。近几十年来,国际政策背景的特点是高风险问责制,但这一议程对教师专业学习动机的影响仍未得到充分探讨。在这项混合方法的研究中,结合了大型教师调查和深入的教师访谈,产生了一个新的重要概念“工具动机”,以捕捉高风险绩效管理政策如何损害教师专业学习的动机。这种创新的方法,采用顺序因素分析和归纳/演绎混合主题分析,包括自决理论,揭示了教师的“工具性动机”应该如何受到限制,并主张采用替代动机策略来支持学校有效的专业学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Studies
British Journal of Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Studies is one of the UK foremost international education journals. It publishes scholarly, research-based articles on education which draw particularly upon historical, philosophical and sociological analysis and sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信