Breaking through banal consumerism? Representations of postconsumerist perspectives in mainstream press media

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
Kristina Boréus, Karin Bradley, Sofie Tornhill
{"title":"Breaking through banal consumerism? Representations of postconsumerist perspectives in mainstream press media","authors":"Kristina Boréus, Karin Bradley, Sofie Tornhill","doi":"10.1177/14695405231199294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current calls for deep societal transformation stress the need to go beyond green consumption and aim for the reduction of material consumption. Such a shift is enacted by grassroots initiatives around reuse, repair and sharing. However, the possibility of postconsumerist perspectives and practices to reach a broader audience is affected by discursive opportunity structures (DOS) formed in public debate. To understand the DOS it is relevant to pay attention both to the continuous normalisation of consumption and to the ways in which alternatives are represented. To develop new analytical tools for examining what postconsumerist initiatives are up against, we introduce the concept of banal consumerism: mundane, habitual expressions that reproduce consumer culture. Through an empirical study of Swedish daily newspapers, we construct the basis for a typology of different expressions of banal consumerism. We find several expressions, of which the massive advertising of consumer goods is the most common but editorial material also plays an important role. This largely disabling DOS is then put in relation to the potentially enabling opportunities entailed in the existing media coverage of postconsumerist initiatives, practices and perspectives. The results show that postconsumerist initiatives and practices are newsworthy and presented as commendable. The fact that high levels of material consumption negatively impact the environment and life on the planet is widely accepted. To argue for degrowth or criticise consumerism is, however, controversial. Thus, support for postconsumerist practices coexist with massive expressions of banal consumerism, creating a complex set of DOS for the postconsumerist initiatives to navigate.","PeriodicalId":51461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Culture","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405231199294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current calls for deep societal transformation stress the need to go beyond green consumption and aim for the reduction of material consumption. Such a shift is enacted by grassroots initiatives around reuse, repair and sharing. However, the possibility of postconsumerist perspectives and practices to reach a broader audience is affected by discursive opportunity structures (DOS) formed in public debate. To understand the DOS it is relevant to pay attention both to the continuous normalisation of consumption and to the ways in which alternatives are represented. To develop new analytical tools for examining what postconsumerist initiatives are up against, we introduce the concept of banal consumerism: mundane, habitual expressions that reproduce consumer culture. Through an empirical study of Swedish daily newspapers, we construct the basis for a typology of different expressions of banal consumerism. We find several expressions, of which the massive advertising of consumer goods is the most common but editorial material also plays an important role. This largely disabling DOS is then put in relation to the potentially enabling opportunities entailed in the existing media coverage of postconsumerist initiatives, practices and perspectives. The results show that postconsumerist initiatives and practices are newsworthy and presented as commendable. The fact that high levels of material consumption negatively impact the environment and life on the planet is widely accepted. To argue for degrowth or criticise consumerism is, however, controversial. Thus, support for postconsumerist practices coexist with massive expressions of banal consumerism, creating a complex set of DOS for the postconsumerist initiatives to navigate.
突破陈腐的消费主义?后消费主义观点在主流新闻媒体中的表现
当前社会深度转型的呼声强调,必须超越绿色消费,以减少物质消费为目标。这种转变是由围绕再利用、修复和共享的基层倡议制定的。然而,后消费主义观点和实践获得更广泛受众的可能性受到公共辩论中形成的话语机会结构(DOS)的影响。要理解DOS,就要关注消费的持续正常化和替代品的表现方式。为了开发新的分析工具来研究后消费主义倡议所面临的挑战,我们引入了平庸消费主义的概念:再现消费文化的世俗、习惯性表达。通过对瑞典日报的实证研究,我们构建了庸俗消费主义不同表现形式的类型学基础。我们发现了几种表现形式,其中大量的消费品广告是最常见的,但编辑材料也起着重要作用。然后将这种很大程度上禁用的DOS与现有媒体对后消费主义倡议、实践和观点的报道所包含的潜在的有利机会联系起来。结果表明,后消费主义的倡议和做法是有新闻价值的,并提出了值得赞扬的。高水平的物质消费对地球上的环境和生命产生负面影响这一事实已被广泛接受。然而,主张去增长或批评消费主义是有争议的。因此,对后消费主义实践的支持与大量陈腐消费主义的表达共存,为后消费主义倡议创造了一套复杂的DOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Culture is a major new journal designed to support and promote the dynamic expansion in interdisciplinary research focused on consumption and consumer culture, opening up debates and areas of exploration. Global in perspective and drawing on both theory and empirical research, the journal reflects the need to engage critically with modern consumer culture and to understand its central role in contemporary social processes. The Journal of Consumer Culture brings together articles from the many social sciences and humanities in which consumer culture has become a significant focus. It also engages with overarching contemporary perspectives on social transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信