The limitations of overtime limits to reduce long working hours: Evidence from the 2018 to 2021 working time reform in Korea

IF 1.3 2区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Stéphane Carcillo, Alexander Hijzen, Stefan Thewissen
{"title":"The limitations of overtime limits to reduce long working hours: Evidence from the 2018 to 2021 working time reform in Korea","authors":"Stéphane Carcillo,&nbsp;Alexander Hijzen,&nbsp;Stefan Thewissen","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides a first assessment of the causal impact of the 2018–2021 reform in Korea meant to combat its long working-hour culture. The reform consists of lowering the statutory limit on total weekly working hours from 68 to 52. We apply a difference-in-difference approach in which we take advantage of the stepwise implementation of the reform by firm size using individual-level data. We present three main findings. First, the introduction of the 52-h limit reduced but far from eliminated the incidence of working more than 52 h. Second, there is some evidence that the introduction led to a reallocation of working hours, with more employees shifting from working fulltime to working overtime within the new limit (41–52 h). Third, and more tentatively, this reallocation more likely took place within firms to account for fewer overtime hours worked by their employees, rather than within households to compensate for any income effects. Overall, our results show that a lower statutory limit can help to lessen a long working-hour culture, but is an insufficient measure by itself to fully eradicate it.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"62 1","pages":"98-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12743","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjir.12743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a first assessment of the causal impact of the 2018–2021 reform in Korea meant to combat its long working-hour culture. The reform consists of lowering the statutory limit on total weekly working hours from 68 to 52. We apply a difference-in-difference approach in which we take advantage of the stepwise implementation of the reform by firm size using individual-level data. We present three main findings. First, the introduction of the 52-h limit reduced but far from eliminated the incidence of working more than 52 h. Second, there is some evidence that the introduction led to a reallocation of working hours, with more employees shifting from working fulltime to working overtime within the new limit (41–52 h). Third, and more tentatively, this reallocation more likely took place within firms to account for fewer overtime hours worked by their employees, rather than within households to compensate for any income effects. Overall, our results show that a lower statutory limit can help to lessen a long working-hour culture, but is an insufficient measure by itself to fully eradicate it.

Abstract Image

加班限制对减少长时间工作的局限性:韩国 2018 至 2021 年工作时间改革的证据
本文对韩国 2018-2021 年改革的因果影响进行了首次评估,该改革旨在打击韩国的长工时文化。改革包括将每周总工时的法定限制从 68 小时降至 52 小时。我们采用差分法,利用个人层面的数据,按企业规模逐步实施改革。我们得出了三个主要结论。首先,52 小时限制的引入降低了工作时间超过 52 小时的发生率,但远未消除这一现象。其次,有证据表明,52 小时限制的引入导致了工作时间的重新分配,更多员工从全职工作转向了新限制(41-52 小时)内的加班工作。第三,更初步地看,这种重新分配更有可能发生在企业内部,以弥补员工加班时数的减少,而不是发生在家庭内部,以补偿任何收入影响。总之,我们的研究结果表明,较低的法定时限有助于减少长工时文化,但这一措施本身并不足以完全消除长工时文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Industrial Relations
British Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: BJIR (British Journal of Industrial Relations) is an influential and authoritative journal which is essential reading for all academics and practitioners interested in work and employment relations. It is the highest ranked European journal in the Industrial Relations & Labour category of the Social Sciences Citation Index. BJIR aims to present the latest research on developments on employment and work from across the globe that appeal to an international readership. Contributions are drawn from all of the main social science disciplines, deal with a broad range of employment topics and express a range of viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信