Stakeholder role in setting curriculum priorities for expanding pharmacy scope of practice

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Emma Bertilsson, Susan Hall, Michelle Bowden, James Townshend, Fiona Kelly
{"title":"Stakeholder role in setting curriculum priorities for expanding pharmacy scope of practice","authors":"Emma Bertilsson, Susan Hall, Michelle Bowden, James Townshend, Fiona Kelly","doi":"10.46542/pe.2023.231.640647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, pharmacy education has evolved as scope of practice expands, from four-year bachelor’s programmes to extended, more clinically focused qualifications. Curriculum transformation is typically led by academics then presented to expert stakeholders for confirmation and comment. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in initial curriculum design to transform pharmacy education at one Australian university. The nominal group technique was used to identify priorities for curriculum and work integrated learning. Twenty-three diverse stakeholders proposed 153 ideas for curriculum and work integrated learning across four sessions, and these were consolidated into 10 to 11 over-arching statements per group and voted on. Group discussions were recorded, then transcribed verbatim followed by thematic analysis of transcripts. Priority areas included specific skills for extended scope and role specialisation, and innovative changes to work-integrated learning to ensure alignment with evolving complexity in practice. Early stakeholder participation enriched curriculum design using a sustainable approach to industry engagement.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.640647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, pharmacy education has evolved as scope of practice expands, from four-year bachelor’s programmes to extended, more clinically focused qualifications. Curriculum transformation is typically led by academics then presented to expert stakeholders for confirmation and comment. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in initial curriculum design to transform pharmacy education at one Australian university. The nominal group technique was used to identify priorities for curriculum and work integrated learning. Twenty-three diverse stakeholders proposed 153 ideas for curriculum and work integrated learning across four sessions, and these were consolidated into 10 to 11 over-arching statements per group and voted on. Group discussions were recorded, then transcribed verbatim followed by thematic analysis of transcripts. Priority areas included specific skills for extended scope and role specialisation, and innovative changes to work-integrated learning to ensure alignment with evolving complexity in practice. Early stakeholder participation enriched curriculum design using a sustainable approach to industry engagement.
利益相关者在设置课程优先级以扩大药学实践范围方面的作用
在全球范围内,药学教育随着实践范围的扩大而发展,从四年制学士学位课程扩展到更注重临床的资格证书。课程改革通常由学者领导,然后提交给专家利益相关者确认和评论。本研究旨在使利益相关者参与初步课程设计,以改变澳大利亚一所大学的药学教育。名义小组技术被用来确定课程和工作整合学习的优先级。在四次会议上,23个不同的利益相关者提出了153个关于课程和工作整合学习的想法,这些想法被每个小组合并成10到11个总体陈述,并进行投票。记录小组讨论,然后逐字抄录,然后对抄本进行专题分析。优先领域包括扩展范围和角色专业化的特定技能,以及对工作集成学习的创新变革,以确保与实践中不断发展的复杂性保持一致。早期利益相关者的参与丰富了课程设计,采用可持续的方法进行行业参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信