Negotiating “what counts” in multimodal writing in the classroom: a high school English teacher’s perspective

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Olivia G. Stewart
{"title":"Negotiating “what counts” in multimodal writing in the classroom: a high school English teacher’s perspective","authors":"Olivia G. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/09518398.2023.2264237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAs students and teachers embrace more forms of multimodal composing, classroom power structures move from the more linear, hierarchical structures typically seen in education to more open, student-centered forms. However, these transitions are not always seamless. Using a multiliteracies framework, this article focuses on how a classroom teacher framed what counted as writing in a senior English class where students created a digital writing portfolio across three platforms. Findings explore what counted as writing from the perspective of the teacher before, during, and after the portfolio unit as well as the struggles that she faced in understanding how to assess the myriad of possible authoring paths multimodal projects offer. Implications extend to how teachers may be influenced by and continue to push back on established institutional power structures to open spaces for reshaping what counts as writing in the classroom.Keywords: Multimodalitymultiliteracieswritingdigital literaciespower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 All names are pseudonyms.2 Students, their parents (if under 18), and the teacher all provided informed, written consent.3 In the transcriptions, “…” indicates that non-essential text is removed for ease of reading and the meaning of the text is still intact; “[…]” indicates a brief pause in speech.Additional informationNotes on contributorsOlivia G. StewartDr. Olivia G. Stewart is an Assistant Professor of Literacy at St. John’s University in the Department of Education Specialties in Queens, NY. Her multiliteracies-framed and critical digital literacies-framed research interests center around multimodal authoring paths and digital-age literacy practices to expand notions of “what counts” as writing, particularly for academically marginalized students. She also examines how critical digital literacy practices can humanize online learning environments to engage learners more authentically and create more equitable learning environments.","PeriodicalId":47971,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2264237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractAs students and teachers embrace more forms of multimodal composing, classroom power structures move from the more linear, hierarchical structures typically seen in education to more open, student-centered forms. However, these transitions are not always seamless. Using a multiliteracies framework, this article focuses on how a classroom teacher framed what counted as writing in a senior English class where students created a digital writing portfolio across three platforms. Findings explore what counted as writing from the perspective of the teacher before, during, and after the portfolio unit as well as the struggles that she faced in understanding how to assess the myriad of possible authoring paths multimodal projects offer. Implications extend to how teachers may be influenced by and continue to push back on established institutional power structures to open spaces for reshaping what counts as writing in the classroom.Keywords: Multimodalitymultiliteracieswritingdigital literaciespower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 All names are pseudonyms.2 Students, their parents (if under 18), and the teacher all provided informed, written consent.3 In the transcriptions, “…” indicates that non-essential text is removed for ease of reading and the meaning of the text is still intact; “[…]” indicates a brief pause in speech.Additional informationNotes on contributorsOlivia G. StewartDr. Olivia G. Stewart is an Assistant Professor of Literacy at St. John’s University in the Department of Education Specialties in Queens, NY. Her multiliteracies-framed and critical digital literacies-framed research interests center around multimodal authoring paths and digital-age literacy practices to expand notions of “what counts” as writing, particularly for academically marginalized students. She also examines how critical digital literacy practices can humanize online learning environments to engage learners more authentically and create more equitable learning environments.
从高中英语教师的角度探讨课堂多模态写作中的“重要内容”
随着学生和教师接受更多形式的多模态构成,课堂权力结构从教育中常见的更线性、层次结构转向更开放、以学生为中心的形式。然而,这些转换并不总是无缝的。本文使用多元读写框架,重点介绍了一位课堂老师如何在高中英语课上构建写作,学生们在三个平台上创建了一个数字写作作品集。调查结果从教师的角度探讨了在作品集单元之前,期间和之后的写作,以及她在理解如何评估多式联运项目提供的无数可能的创作路径时所面临的斗争。其影响延伸到教师如何受到既定制度权力结构的影响,并继续推动其开放空间,以重塑课堂上的写作。关键词:多模态多读写能力写作数字读写能力披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1所有名字均为笔名学生、家长(如果未满18岁)和老师都提供了知情的书面同意在转录中,“…”表示为了方便阅读而删除了不必要的文本,并且文本的含义仍然完整;“[…]”表示讲话中的短暂停顿。作者简介:苏利维亚·g·斯图尔特博士奥利维亚·g·斯图尔特(Olivia G. Stewart)是纽约皇后区圣约翰大学教育专业的扫盲助理教授。她的多元素养框架和批判性数字素养框架的研究兴趣集中在多模态创作路径和数字时代的素养实践上,以扩展“什么是”写作的概念,特别是对于学术边缘化的学生。她还研究了关键的数字素养实践如何使在线学习环境更加人性化,从而更真实地吸引学习者,创造更公平的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (popularly known as QSE) is to enhance the practice and theory of qualitative research in education, with “education” defined in the broadest possible sense, including non-school settings. The journal publishes peer-reviewed empirical research focused on critical issues of racism (including whiteness, white racism, and white supremacy), capitalism and its class structure (including critiques of neoliberalism), gender and gender identity, heterosexism and homophobia, LGBTQI/queer issues, home culture and language biases, immigration xenophobia, domination, and other issues of oppression and exclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信