Enabling dialogic, democratic research: using a community of philosophical enquiry as a qualitative research method

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Love, V. Randall
{"title":"Enabling dialogic, democratic research: using a community of philosophical enquiry as a qualitative research method","authors":"R. Love, V. Randall","doi":"10.1080/09518398.2023.2267027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophy for Children is a pedagogical approach practised worldwide. Although well known for its contribution to democratic teaching and learning its contribution to critical research is relatively unknown. In this paper we present the use of a Community of Enquiry (CoE), as conceptualised in Philosophy for Children, as a qualitative research method that foregrounds participant voice. Framed through Freirean critical pedagogy and social transformation, we present research undertaken with primary pre-service teachers in England, exploring their emerging teacher identity, and detail the method of how a CoE was enabled. We conclude and advocate that a CoE aligns with a research axiology concomitant with ethical critical practices and argue for an environment that enables the researcher, and participants, to generate data collaboratively and collectively through democratic dialogue. Finally, our findings show that a CoE can have much to offer qualitative critical scholars beyond its originally intended pedagogical contribution.","PeriodicalId":47971,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2267027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophy for Children is a pedagogical approach practised worldwide. Although well known for its contribution to democratic teaching and learning its contribution to critical research is relatively unknown. In this paper we present the use of a Community of Enquiry (CoE), as conceptualised in Philosophy for Children, as a qualitative research method that foregrounds participant voice. Framed through Freirean critical pedagogy and social transformation, we present research undertaken with primary pre-service teachers in England, exploring their emerging teacher identity, and detail the method of how a CoE was enabled. We conclude and advocate that a CoE aligns with a research axiology concomitant with ethical critical practices and argue for an environment that enables the researcher, and participants, to generate data collaboratively and collectively through democratic dialogue. Finally, our findings show that a CoE can have much to offer qualitative critical scholars beyond its originally intended pedagogical contribution.
使对话,民主的研究:使用一个社区的哲学探究作为定性研究方法
儿童哲学是一种全世界都在使用的教学方法。虽然它对民主教学和学习的贡献是众所周知的,但它对批判性研究的贡献却相对不为人知。在本文中,我们介绍了在儿童哲学中概念化的调查社区(CoE)的使用,作为一种强调参与者声音的定性研究方法。在Freirean批判教学法和社会转型的框架下,我们介绍了对英国小学职前教师进行的研究,探索他们新兴的教师身份,并详细介绍了CoE是如何实现的方法。我们的结论和主张是,CoE与与伦理批判实践相结合的研究价值论保持一致,并主张创造一种环境,使研究人员和参与者能够通过民主对话协作和集体地生成数据。最后,我们的研究结果表明,CoE可以为定性批判性学者提供许多超出其最初预期的教学贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (popularly known as QSE) is to enhance the practice and theory of qualitative research in education, with “education” defined in the broadest possible sense, including non-school settings. The journal publishes peer-reviewed empirical research focused on critical issues of racism (including whiteness, white racism, and white supremacy), capitalism and its class structure (including critiques of neoliberalism), gender and gender identity, heterosexism and homophobia, LGBTQI/queer issues, home culture and language biases, immigration xenophobia, domination, and other issues of oppression and exclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信