Inclusion: how far have we come and how far can we go?

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julie Allan
{"title":"Inclusion: how far have we come and how far can we go?","authors":"Julie Allan","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2023.2264059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether inclusion has gone too far is being raised by a growing number of people. In Sweden, this has been formalised in a governmental declaration that also recommends that children with special needs should have access to specialist segregated provision. In this paper, the question of how far we have come towards inclusive education is considered and the barriers to progress, that come from the system, attitudes and outcomes, are identified. In reflecting on how far we can go, the case will be made for recognising the diversity and creativity among two key groups: teachers and school leaders and researchers. Teachers’ and school leaders’ capabilities in finding inclusive possibilities for their students, particularly during the pandemic, will be illustrated with the findings of an international research project, DIGITAL (Diversifying Inclusion and Growth: Inclusive Technologies for Accessible Learning) in the time of Coronavirus. The capacities of researchers at a Swedish University, seeking to examine inclusion from cross-cultural, intersectional and interdisciplinary perspectives and to model inclusive practice, will also be highlighted. The hope is to provoke discussion of how to ensure teachers and researchers can fully contribute to inclusion and to consider how far we can go.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2264059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of whether inclusion has gone too far is being raised by a growing number of people. In Sweden, this has been formalised in a governmental declaration that also recommends that children with special needs should have access to specialist segregated provision. In this paper, the question of how far we have come towards inclusive education is considered and the barriers to progress, that come from the system, attitudes and outcomes, are identified. In reflecting on how far we can go, the case will be made for recognising the diversity and creativity among two key groups: teachers and school leaders and researchers. Teachers’ and school leaders’ capabilities in finding inclusive possibilities for their students, particularly during the pandemic, will be illustrated with the findings of an international research project, DIGITAL (Diversifying Inclusion and Growth: Inclusive Technologies for Accessible Learning) in the time of Coronavirus. The capacities of researchers at a Swedish University, seeking to examine inclusion from cross-cultural, intersectional and interdisciplinary perspectives and to model inclusive practice, will also be highlighted. The hope is to provoke discussion of how to ensure teachers and researchers can fully contribute to inclusion and to consider how far we can go.
包容:我们已经走了多远,还能走多远?
越来越多的人提出了包容性是否走得太远的问题。在瑞典,这在一项政府宣言中得到了正式认可,该宣言还建议有特殊需要的儿童应该获得专门的隔离服务。在本文中,我们考虑了我们在包容性教育方面走了多远的问题,并确定了来自系统,态度和结果的进步障碍。在思考我们能走多远的时候,我们将会认识到两个关键群体的多样性和创造力:教师、学校领导和研究人员。教师和学校领导为学生寻找包容性可能性的能力,特别是在大流行期间,将通过冠状病毒时期数字化(多元化包容和增长:包容性技术促进无障碍学习)国际研究项目的结果来说明。瑞典一所大学的研究人员的能力,从跨文化、交叉和跨学科的角度审视包容性,并为包容性实践树立榜样,也将得到强调。希望能引发讨论,讨论如何确保教师和研究人员能够为包容性做出充分贡献,并考虑我们能走多远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信