A Transactional or a Relational Contract? The Student-Consumer, Social Participation and Alumni Donations in Higher Education

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Manuel Souto-Otero, Michael Donnelly, Mine Kanol
{"title":"A Transactional or a Relational Contract? The Student-Consumer, Social Participation and Alumni Donations in Higher Education","authors":"Manuel Souto-Otero, Michael Donnelly, Mine Kanol","doi":"10.1080/00071005.2023.2245441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe relationship between students and higher education is seen to have become increasingly transactional. We approach the study of the student–HE relationship in a novel way, by focusing on students’ behaviour post-university, rather than on student narratives. Conceptually, the article builds on multidimensional views of student engagement and the differentiation between psychological transactional contracts – where students who achieve better academic results are more likely to donate – and relational contracts – where students donate more following engagement in social experiences. Making use of longitudinal data on donation behaviour from over 50,000 alumni from an English university over two decades, we find that while students who get better degree outcomes are more likely to donate, the association between participation in social experiences and donations is much stronger. This questions prevalent transactional models of HE and underlines the limitations of purely consumerist views of the relation between students and higher education institutions, even in the marketized UK context.Keywords: higher educationalumnidonationsstudent-consumersocial participationUK 6. AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank Andres Sandoval Hernandez for valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. All remaining errors are ours.7. Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).8. Ethics StatementThis work is secondary analysis of de-identified institutional data. No new data collection took place, and ethical review and approval was not required.Data Availability StatementThe authors do not have institutional permission to share the data employed in the production of the article.Notes1 We thank reviewers for emphasising the importance of the role of solicitation, including through social media as mentioned later in the article.","PeriodicalId":47509,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2023.2245441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe relationship between students and higher education is seen to have become increasingly transactional. We approach the study of the student–HE relationship in a novel way, by focusing on students’ behaviour post-university, rather than on student narratives. Conceptually, the article builds on multidimensional views of student engagement and the differentiation between psychological transactional contracts – where students who achieve better academic results are more likely to donate – and relational contracts – where students donate more following engagement in social experiences. Making use of longitudinal data on donation behaviour from over 50,000 alumni from an English university over two decades, we find that while students who get better degree outcomes are more likely to donate, the association between participation in social experiences and donations is much stronger. This questions prevalent transactional models of HE and underlines the limitations of purely consumerist views of the relation between students and higher education institutions, even in the marketized UK context.Keywords: higher educationalumnidonationsstudent-consumersocial participationUK 6. AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank Andres Sandoval Hernandez for valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. All remaining errors are ours.7. Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).8. Ethics StatementThis work is secondary analysis of de-identified institutional data. No new data collection took place, and ethical review and approval was not required.Data Availability StatementThe authors do not have institutional permission to share the data employed in the production of the article.Notes1 We thank reviewers for emphasising the importance of the role of solicitation, including through social media as mentioned later in the article.
交易契约还是关系契约?高等教育中的学生消费者、社会参与与校友捐赠
摘要学生与高等教育之间的关系越来越具有事务性。我们以一种新颖的方式来研究学生与高等教育的关系,通过关注学生在大学毕业后的行为,而不是学生的叙述。从概念上讲,这篇文章建立在学生参与的多维视角和心理交易契约(学业成绩更好的学生更有可能捐赠)和关系契约(学生在参与社会经历后捐赠更多)之间的区别之上。通过对一所英国大学5万多名校友20多年来捐赠行为的纵向数据分析,我们发现,虽然获得更好学位的学生更有可能捐赠,但参与社会体验和捐赠之间的关联要强得多。这对高等教育普遍存在的交易模式提出了质疑,并强调了纯粹的消费主义观点对学生和高等教育机构之间关系的局限性,即使在市场化的英国背景下也是如此。关键词:高等教育;校友;学生;作者要感谢Andres Sandoval Hernandez对本文早期版本的宝贵意见和建议。剩下的错误都是我们的。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伦理声明这项工作是对去识别的机构数据的二次分析。没有进行新的数据收集,也不需要进行伦理审查和批准。数据可用性声明作者没有机构许可共享文章生产中使用的数据。注1:我们感谢审稿人强调征集的重要性,包括文章后面提到的通过社交媒体征集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Studies
British Journal of Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Studies is one of the UK foremost international education journals. It publishes scholarly, research-based articles on education which draw particularly upon historical, philosophical and sociological analysis and sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信