Teaching and Evaluating an Occupational Perspective in Canada: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Katie Lee Bunting, Kristen Honeybourne, Michelle Wheeler, Susan J Forwell
{"title":"Teaching and Evaluating an Occupational Perspective in Canada: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.","authors":"Katie Lee Bunting, Kristen Honeybourne, Michelle Wheeler, Susan J Forwell","doi":"10.1177/00084174231212759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Occupation is the core domain of occupational therapy, and an occupational perspective is foundational for practice. Research has explored how an occupational perspective is taught. Yet, little has explored the Canadian occupational therapy educational context. There are national differences in core competencies and accreditation standards and nuances in how occupation is defined and what conceptual models are used. As such, a Canadian perspective may offer new understandings of value both within and outside of Canada. <b>Purpose.</b> To understand how, in Canada, educators teach and evaluate student occupational perspectives in entry-level master of occupational therapy programs. <b>Method.</b> This study used a descriptive qualitative design with an interpretive approach. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather data from 12 educators from Canadian entry-level occupational therapy programs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. <b>Findings.</b> Five themes were identified: (1) occupational perspectives as pedagogy (2) it's a process, not an end state; (3) \"everybody is involved\": a community of educators; (4) thinking critically; and (5) \"hard to evaluate.\" <b>Conclusion.</b> The complex, dynamic, and contextualized nature of an occupational perspective calls for critical, reflexive, communal, and innovative pedagogical and assessment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174231212759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Occupation is the core domain of occupational therapy, and an occupational perspective is foundational for practice. Research has explored how an occupational perspective is taught. Yet, little has explored the Canadian occupational therapy educational context. There are national differences in core competencies and accreditation standards and nuances in how occupation is defined and what conceptual models are used. As such, a Canadian perspective may offer new understandings of value both within and outside of Canada. Purpose. To understand how, in Canada, educators teach and evaluate student occupational perspectives in entry-level master of occupational therapy programs. Method. This study used a descriptive qualitative design with an interpretive approach. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather data from 12 educators from Canadian entry-level occupational therapy programs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Findings. Five themes were identified: (1) occupational perspectives as pedagogy (2) it's a process, not an end state; (3) "everybody is involved": a community of educators; (4) thinking critically; and (5) "hard to evaluate." Conclusion. The complex, dynamic, and contextualized nature of an occupational perspective calls for critical, reflexive, communal, and innovative pedagogical and assessment approaches.

加拿大职业视角的教学与评价:一项描述性质的研究。
背景。职业是职业治疗的核心领域,职业视角是实践的基础。研究探索了如何教授职业视角。然而,很少有人探讨加拿大职业治疗的教育背景。各国在核心能力和认证标准方面存在差异,在如何定义职业和使用什么概念模型方面存在细微差别。因此,加拿大人的观点可能会为加拿大国内外的价值观提供新的理解。目的。了解在加拿大,教育工作者如何在入门级职业治疗硕士课程中教授和评估学生的职业观点。方法。本研究采用描述性定性设计和解释性方法。采用半结构化访谈收集来自加拿大入门级职业治疗项目的12名教育工作者的数据。数据分析采用反身性专题分析。发现。确定了五个主题:(1)职业视角作为教育学(2)这是一个过程,而不是最终状态;(3) “人人参与”:教育者组成的社区;(4)批判性思维;和(5)“很难评估。”结论。职业视角的复杂性、动态性和情境性要求批判性、反思性、共体性和创新性的教学和评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信