Near-optimal Test Sequencing Algorithms For Sequential Fault Diagnosisl

V. Raghavan, K. Pattipati
{"title":"Near-optimal Test Sequencing Algorithms For Sequential Fault Diagnosisl","authors":"V. Raghavan, K. Pattipati","doi":"10.1109/ATW.1994.747834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In [1], optimal AN DIOR, graph search algorithms were developed to analyze the testability of a systeln design and to determine an optimal sequence of tests for the trouble-shooting of hierarchical systems. However, NP-hardness of the test sequencing problem makes the computation of optimal testseq{lence impractical for even moderate-sized problems. Hence, there is a need for near-optimal test sequencing algorithms that provide a trade-off between optimality and computational complexity. Consequently, we have developed three classes of nearoptimal algorithms: multi-step information heuristic, hybrid breadth-depth search, and rninimax heuristic. These algorithms compute fault isolation strategies with significantly lower computational requirements than the optimal A0\" algorithm and have enabled us to solve testability analysis problems with as many as 50,000 failure sources and 45,000 test points. In ac\\dition, our test-sequencing algorithms handle precedence constraints on tests, overlapping setup operations for tests, rectification/replacement of modules, and fault isolation to any desired level of the system hierarchy. The above suite of test-sequencing algorithms were extended to handle the case of imperfect tests, where in missed detections and false alarms add another dimension of uncertainty to the testing process .","PeriodicalId":217615,"journal":{"name":"The Third Annual Atlantic Test Workshop","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Third Annual Atlantic Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATW.1994.747834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In [1], optimal AN DIOR, graph search algorithms were developed to analyze the testability of a systeln design and to determine an optimal sequence of tests for the trouble-shooting of hierarchical systems. However, NP-hardness of the test sequencing problem makes the computation of optimal testseq{lence impractical for even moderate-sized problems. Hence, there is a need for near-optimal test sequencing algorithms that provide a trade-off between optimality and computational complexity. Consequently, we have developed three classes of nearoptimal algorithms: multi-step information heuristic, hybrid breadth-depth search, and rninimax heuristic. These algorithms compute fault isolation strategies with significantly lower computational requirements than the optimal A0" algorithm and have enabled us to solve testability analysis problems with as many as 50,000 failure sources and 45,000 test points. In ac\dition, our test-sequencing algorithms handle precedence constraints on tests, overlapping setup operations for tests, rectification/replacement of modules, and fault isolation to any desired level of the system hierarchy. The above suite of test-sequencing algorithms were extended to handle the case of imperfect tests, where in missed detections and false alarms add another dimension of uncertainty to the testing process .
序列故障诊断的近最优测试排序算法
在[1]中,最优的AN迪奥,图搜索算法被开发来分析系统设计的可测试性,并确定分层系统故障排除的最优测试序列。然而,测试排序问题的np -硬度使得最优测试序列的计算即使对于中等规模的问题也是不切实际的。因此,需要在最优性和计算复杂性之间提供权衡的近最优测试排序算法。因此,我们开发了三类近似最优算法:多步信息启发式、混合宽度深度搜索和最小启发式。这些算法计算故障隔离策略的计算需求明显低于最优A0”算法,并使我们能够解决多达50,000个故障源和45,000个测试点的可测试性分析问题。此外,我们的测试排序算法处理测试的优先约束、测试的重叠设置操作、模块的纠正/替换以及对系统层次结构的任何期望级别的故障隔离。对上述测试排序算法套件进行了扩展,以处理不完美测试的情况,在这种情况下,漏检和假警报为测试过程增加了另一个不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信