System-level reliability using component-level failure signatures

R. Wong, B. Bhuva, A. Evans, S. Wen
{"title":"System-level reliability using component-level failure signatures","authors":"R. Wong, B. Bhuva, A. Evans, S. Wen","doi":"10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System-level Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is usually evaluated using individual component-level reliability metrics. System-level failures are categorized by Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) metrics. However, RAS evaluation at the system-level requires precise mapping between component failure modes, their system failure signatures and system reliability requirements. In this paper, RAS analysis carried out on internet switches in a top-down hierarchical fashion is presented. Results show availability of failure classification at a lower-level of design allows for better fault management and improved RAS metrics at the system-level. A hierarchical modeling format is proposed to standardize the reporting of component failure modes to improve the system level modeling of RAS.","PeriodicalId":341663,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

System-level Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is usually evaluated using individual component-level reliability metrics. System-level failures are categorized by Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) metrics. However, RAS evaluation at the system-level requires precise mapping between component failure modes, their system failure signatures and system reliability requirements. In this paper, RAS analysis carried out on internet switches in a top-down hierarchical fashion is presented. Results show availability of failure classification at a lower-level of design allows for better fault management and improved RAS metrics at the system-level. A hierarchical modeling format is proposed to standardize the reporting of component failure modes to improve the system level modeling of RAS.
使用组件级故障签名的系统级可靠性
系统级平均无故障时间(MTBF)通常使用单个组件级可靠性度量来评估。系统级故障按可靠性、可用性和可服务性(RAS)指标分类。然而,系统级的RAS评估需要组件故障模式、它们的系统故障签名和系统可靠性需求之间的精确映射。本文以自顶向下的分层方式对互联网交换机进行了RAS分析。结果表明,在较低层次的设计中,故障分类的可用性允许更好的故障管理和改进系统级的RAS指标。提出了一种分层建模格式来规范构件失效模式的报告,以改进RAS的系统级建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信