Wafer-scale integration defect avoidance tradeoffs between laser links and Omega network switching

G. Chapman, D. E. Bergen, K. Fang
{"title":"Wafer-scale integration defect avoidance tradeoffs between laser links and Omega network switching","authors":"G. Chapman, D. E. Bergen, K. Fang","doi":"10.1109/DFTVS.1995.476935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Area, signal delay, and power consumption requirements are obtained in both 3 micron and 1.5 micron CMOS for two wafer scale defect avoidance methods: laser linking and active switching. In laser linking, focused laser power is used at each site to interconnect and cut bus lines. Active switching elements, such as the Omega network, enable real-time defect bypassing for self healing reconfigurations. Comparisons using simulations and fabricated device measurements of an Omega switch relative to laser links shows the area ranges from 5 to 11 times larger (respectively for the 1.5 and 3 micron processes), it requires an extra 18 to 25 nsec of signal delay and cell drivers to consume 60% more power than the laser links. Laser linked signal paths are so much faster than active switches that they effectively bypass failed switches without introducing significant extra delay. Thus a superior defect avoidance switch combines laser links and the Omega switch into a single unit.","PeriodicalId":362167,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.1995.476935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Area, signal delay, and power consumption requirements are obtained in both 3 micron and 1.5 micron CMOS for two wafer scale defect avoidance methods: laser linking and active switching. In laser linking, focused laser power is used at each site to interconnect and cut bus lines. Active switching elements, such as the Omega network, enable real-time defect bypassing for self healing reconfigurations. Comparisons using simulations and fabricated device measurements of an Omega switch relative to laser links shows the area ranges from 5 to 11 times larger (respectively for the 1.5 and 3 micron processes), it requires an extra 18 to 25 nsec of signal delay and cell drivers to consume 60% more power than the laser links. Laser linked signal paths are so much faster than active switches that they effectively bypass failed switches without introducing significant extra delay. Thus a superior defect avoidance switch combines laser links and the Omega switch into a single unit.
晶圆级集成缺陷避免在激光链路和Omega网络交换之间的权衡
在3微米和1.5微米的CMOS中,获得了两种晶圆级缺陷避免方法:激光连接和主动开关的面积、信号延迟和功耗要求。在激光连接中,在每个站点使用聚焦激光功率来互连和切割总线线路。主动开关元件,例如Omega网络,能够实现实时缺陷绕过,以实现自我修复重新配置。使用模拟和制造设备测量的Omega开关相对于激光链路的比较显示,面积范围从5到11倍大(分别为1.5微米和3微米工艺),它需要额外的18到25秒的信号延迟和单元驱动器消耗比激光链路多60%的功率。激光链接信号路径比主动开关快得多,它们有效地绕过故障开关,而不会引入显著的额外延迟。因此,一个优越的缺陷避免开关结合激光链路和欧米茄开关成一个单一的单元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信