Polymeric reinforcement approaches and materials selection to improve board-level drop reliability of SnAgCu soldered area array packages

Hongbin Shi, Cuihua Tian, M. Pecht, T. Ueda
{"title":"Polymeric reinforcement approaches and materials selection to improve board-level drop reliability of SnAgCu soldered area array packages","authors":"Hongbin Shi, Cuihua Tian, M. Pecht, T. Ueda","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The board-level drop performance of area array package (AAP) assemblies is becoming increasingly critical due to the shift from desktop to mobile computing. Furthermore, challenges have arisen from the introduction of lead-free solders and miniaturization of solder joint dimensions. Polymeric reinforcement of AAPs offers a solution for drop reliability concerns. However, polymeric reinforcement increases the unit manufacturing cost of materials, capital equipment, cycle time, and rework. All of the polymeric reinforcement approaches, such as full capillary flow underfill (FCFU), partial capillary flow underfill (PCFU), edge bond adhesive (EBA), and corner bond adhesive (CBA), improve the drop reliability of lead-free fine-pitch AAP assemblies. However, the use of a polymeric reinforcement strategy with improper implementation and/or material properties may cause an unnecessary rise in manufacturing costs and/or cause the assemblies to fail to meet the drop performance requirements of a specific application. This study compares the different polymeric reinforcement approaches (FCFU, PCFU, EBA, and CBA) and material properties for AAPs using a vertical free drop test. One set of AAP assemblies with no polymeric reinforcement was tested as the control. The test results indicated that the drop performance of reinforced CSP assemblies increased with the use of better polymeric reinforcement material volume and modulus and higher adhesive strength of the materials. The components closer to outer edges of the PCB were more prone to failure compared to the components at the center of the PCB. In addition to the failure criteria based on daisy-chain resistance, the drop impact life based on the CSPs that fell of the PCBs can also be used simply to compare the performance of different polymeric reinforcement strategies. Failure analysis demonstrated that the dominant failure mode was brittle fracture at the CSP IMC/solder interface for all the test groups except the underfilled samples. However, the percentage of the PCB pad cratering failure mode significantly increased with the application of polymeric reinforcement materials.","PeriodicalId":431312,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 14th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2012.6507082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The board-level drop performance of area array package (AAP) assemblies is becoming increasingly critical due to the shift from desktop to mobile computing. Furthermore, challenges have arisen from the introduction of lead-free solders and miniaturization of solder joint dimensions. Polymeric reinforcement of AAPs offers a solution for drop reliability concerns. However, polymeric reinforcement increases the unit manufacturing cost of materials, capital equipment, cycle time, and rework. All of the polymeric reinforcement approaches, such as full capillary flow underfill (FCFU), partial capillary flow underfill (PCFU), edge bond adhesive (EBA), and corner bond adhesive (CBA), improve the drop reliability of lead-free fine-pitch AAP assemblies. However, the use of a polymeric reinforcement strategy with improper implementation and/or material properties may cause an unnecessary rise in manufacturing costs and/or cause the assemblies to fail to meet the drop performance requirements of a specific application. This study compares the different polymeric reinforcement approaches (FCFU, PCFU, EBA, and CBA) and material properties for AAPs using a vertical free drop test. One set of AAP assemblies with no polymeric reinforcement was tested as the control. The test results indicated that the drop performance of reinforced CSP assemblies increased with the use of better polymeric reinforcement material volume and modulus and higher adhesive strength of the materials. The components closer to outer edges of the PCB were more prone to failure compared to the components at the center of the PCB. In addition to the failure criteria based on daisy-chain resistance, the drop impact life based on the CSPs that fell of the PCBs can also be used simply to compare the performance of different polymeric reinforcement strategies. Failure analysis demonstrated that the dominant failure mode was brittle fracture at the CSP IMC/solder interface for all the test groups except the underfilled samples. However, the percentage of the PCB pad cratering failure mode significantly increased with the application of polymeric reinforcement materials.
提高SnAgCu焊区阵列封装板级跌落可靠性的聚合物增强方法和材料选择
由于从桌面计算到移动计算的转变,区域阵列封装(AAP)组件的板级下降性能变得越来越重要。此外,无铅焊料的引入和焊点尺寸的小型化也带来了挑战。aap的聚合物增强为滴入可靠性问题提供了解决方案。然而,聚合物增强增加了材料、资本设备、周期时间和返工的单位制造成本。所有的聚合物增强方法,如全毛细流动底填料(FCFU)、部分毛细流动底填料(PCFU)、边缘粘结剂(EBA)和角粘结剂(CBA),都可以提高无铅细间距AAP组件的滴入可靠性。然而,使用不当的聚合物增强策略和/或材料性能可能会导致制造成本的不必要增加和/或导致组件无法满足特定应用的下降性能要求。本研究通过垂直自由跌落试验比较了不同的聚合物增强方法(FCFU、PCFU、EBA和CBA)和aap材料的性能。以一组无聚合物增强的AAP组件作为对照。试验结果表明,聚合物增强材料的体积和模量越好,材料的粘接强度越高,增强CSP组件的下降性能越好。与PCB中心的组件相比,靠近PCB外缘的组件更容易发生故障。除了基于菊花链电阻的失效标准外,基于pcb的csp下降的跌落冲击寿命也可以简单地用于比较不同聚合物增强策略的性能。失效分析表明,除未填充样品外,所有试验组的CSP IMC/钎料界面的主要失效模式为脆性断裂。然而,随着聚合物增强材料的应用,PCB板的击穿失效模式的百分比显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信