Comparative study on delineation of Cu-Al intermetallic using chemical treatment and ion milling

L. Yeoh, Kok-Cheng Chong, Susan X. Li
{"title":"Comparative study on delineation of Cu-Al intermetallic using chemical treatment and ion milling","authors":"L. Yeoh, Kok-Cheng Chong, Susan X. Li","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2013.6745701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intermetallic (IMC) is an alloy formed between two or more metals. Understanding IMC growth and formation is important in determining the bond integrity and the conductivity between metals. While Au-Al IMC is easily detected, Cu-Al IMC is hardly seen due to a slower interdiffusion rate between Cu and Al. This Cu-Al IMC can create a big challenge in analyzing suspected wire bond to bond pad interface failures, since defects may be difficult to find, and it makes delineating the different phases of IMC layers difficult. These limitations may lead to inaccurate findings and may result in invalid analysis conclusions. Chemical treatment has been proposed to be a good approach for IMC delineation. We evaluated the solution of hydrochloric acid (HCI) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) with five different mixing ratios (4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, and 0:1 by volume) to delineate the Cu-Al IMC. Another methodology, focused ion beam (FIB) ion milling, is a surface preparation technique which uses an ion beam to strip away an extensive two-dimensional surface area for microscopic analysis. A comparative study was performed between chemical treatment and ion milling on the success of delineation of the Cu-Al IMC. Chemical treatment is a lower cost method which provides IMC delineation at a wider area (entire bonding interface), while ion milling is a higher cost method which does at a smaller area (selected bonding region). Both techniques are found to be very useful in IMC analysis for failure mechanism identification and root cause determination.","PeriodicalId":210691,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 15th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC 2013)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 15th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2013.6745701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intermetallic (IMC) is an alloy formed between two or more metals. Understanding IMC growth and formation is important in determining the bond integrity and the conductivity between metals. While Au-Al IMC is easily detected, Cu-Al IMC is hardly seen due to a slower interdiffusion rate between Cu and Al. This Cu-Al IMC can create a big challenge in analyzing suspected wire bond to bond pad interface failures, since defects may be difficult to find, and it makes delineating the different phases of IMC layers difficult. These limitations may lead to inaccurate findings and may result in invalid analysis conclusions. Chemical treatment has been proposed to be a good approach for IMC delineation. We evaluated the solution of hydrochloric acid (HCI) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) with five different mixing ratios (4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, and 0:1 by volume) to delineate the Cu-Al IMC. Another methodology, focused ion beam (FIB) ion milling, is a surface preparation technique which uses an ion beam to strip away an extensive two-dimensional surface area for microscopic analysis. A comparative study was performed between chemical treatment and ion milling on the success of delineation of the Cu-Al IMC. Chemical treatment is a lower cost method which provides IMC delineation at a wider area (entire bonding interface), while ion milling is a higher cost method which does at a smaller area (selected bonding region). Both techniques are found to be very useful in IMC analysis for failure mechanism identification and root cause determination.
化学处理与离子铣削描绘铜铝金属间化合物的比较研究
金属间化合物(IMC)是两种或多种金属之间形成的合金。了解IMC的生长和形成对于确定金属之间的键完整性和电导率非常重要。虽然Au-Al的IMC很容易被检测到,但由于Cu和Al之间的相互扩散速度较慢,Cu-Al的IMC很难被发现。由于Cu-Al的IMC可能难以发现缺陷,因此在分析可疑的线键到键垫界面故障时,Cu-Al的IMC可能会带来很大的挑战,并且它使得描绘IMC层的不同阶段变得困难。这些限制可能导致不准确的发现,并可能导致无效的分析结论。化学处理被认为是一种很好的IMC描述方法。我们以五种不同的混合比例(4:1,3:1,2:1,1:1和0:1体积)对盐酸(HCI)和异丙醇(IPA)溶液进行了评估,以描绘Cu-Al IMC。另一种方法,聚焦离子束(FIB)离子铣削,是一种表面制备技术,它使用离子束剥离广泛的二维表面区域进行微观分析。对比研究了化学处理与离子铣削对Cu-Al IMC圈定效果的影响。化学处理是一种成本较低的方法,可以在更宽的区域(整个键合界面)提供IMC描述,而离子铣削是一种成本较高的方法,可以在较小的区域(选定的键合区域)进行描述。这两种技术在IMC分析中对故障机理识别和根本原因确定都非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信