Experimental comparison of the various validation method using broadband antenna for radiated emission test site

K. Osabe, T. Yamanaka, J. Kawano
{"title":"Experimental comparison of the various validation method using broadband antenna for radiated emission test site","authors":"K. Osabe, T. Yamanaka, J. Kawano","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2004.1349915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental comparison of the various validation methods (CISPR16-1, ANSI C63.5 revision and Dual AF method) using the broadband antenna of biconical, log periodic and full-range type was performed at seven radiated emission test sites. With regard to each method, it was compared with the NSA value including the correction factor, which is measured by a pair of dipole antennas. As the result, it was concluded that, even when the broadband antenna is used, the NSA calculation up to 300 MHz should consider the influence of mutual impedance coupling of antennas and of the ground plane in the same manner with using a pair of dipole antennas.","PeriodicalId":378094,"journal":{"name":"2004 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37559)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37559)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2004.1349915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental comparison of the various validation methods (CISPR16-1, ANSI C63.5 revision and Dual AF method) using the broadband antenna of biconical, log periodic and full-range type was performed at seven radiated emission test sites. With regard to each method, it was compared with the NSA value including the correction factor, which is measured by a pair of dipole antennas. As the result, it was concluded that, even when the broadband antenna is used, the NSA calculation up to 300 MHz should consider the influence of mutual impedance coupling of antennas and of the ground plane in the same manner with using a pair of dipole antennas.
利用宽带天线进行辐射发射试验场各种验证方法的实验比较
在7个辐射发射试验点对采用双锥型、对数周期型和全量程型宽带天线的CISPR16-1、ANSI C63.5修订版和Dual AF方法进行了实验比较。将每种方法与包含校正因子的NSA值进行比较,NSA值由一对偶极子天线测量。结果表明,即使使用宽带天线,300 MHz以内的NSA计算也应像使用一对偶极子天线一样,考虑天线间互阻抗耦合和地平面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信