Power lines, cancer, and erroneous physics

J. Ashley, R.E. Beatie, J.F. Heneage
{"title":"Power lines, cancer, and erroneous physics","authors":"J. Ashley, R.E. Beatie, J.F. Heneage","doi":"10.1109/ELECTR.1998.682111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 1979 epidemiologic study in Denver found that living near overhead distribution lines significantly increased the risk of certain kinds of childhood cancers. No measurements of electrical quantities were made. The hypothesis advanced as an explanation was that the magnetic field would be the causative agent and that the magnetic fields could be estimated by counting the number of conductors on the line and measuring the distance to the home, termed \"wiring configurations\". By estimating the induced current density in humans standing below the power lines, one learns that the electric field must be considered as a possible causative agent. The follow-on study in Denver failed to properly measure the fields directly under the power line. The defined wiring configuration codes failed to account for the spacing of the conductors or the location of the residence with respect to the supply substation. The idea that wiring configurations (a.k.a. wiring codes) estimate magnetic fields is erroneous. The studies in Denver, Los Angeles, Sweden, Finland, and a large area in the USA have found insufficient confidence in the magnetic field hypothesis, possibly because of many other physics errors; e.g., ignoring the role of vector direction, time and space averaging, not measuring any reasonable aspect of the power line electric fields and ignoring the engineering design differences in the transmission and distribution systems. The Scandinavian studies concentrated on 115 kV to 400 kV bulk transmission lines; yet, failed to consider the electric fields which induce at least ten times greater current density in a human than do the magnetic fields near the same lines. The cumulative effect of these serious errors in engineering physics is that the past decade of funded research has failed to explain why living adjacent to overhead distribution power lines in Denver and Los Angeles and living within 50 meters of bulk transmission lines in Sweden increases the risk of childhood leukemia.","PeriodicalId":402966,"journal":{"name":"Professional Program Proceedings. Electro 98 (Cat. No.98CH36240)","volume":"79 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Program Proceedings. Electro 98 (Cat. No.98CH36240)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECTR.1998.682111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A 1979 epidemiologic study in Denver found that living near overhead distribution lines significantly increased the risk of certain kinds of childhood cancers. No measurements of electrical quantities were made. The hypothesis advanced as an explanation was that the magnetic field would be the causative agent and that the magnetic fields could be estimated by counting the number of conductors on the line and measuring the distance to the home, termed "wiring configurations". By estimating the induced current density in humans standing below the power lines, one learns that the electric field must be considered as a possible causative agent. The follow-on study in Denver failed to properly measure the fields directly under the power line. The defined wiring configuration codes failed to account for the spacing of the conductors or the location of the residence with respect to the supply substation. The idea that wiring configurations (a.k.a. wiring codes) estimate magnetic fields is erroneous. The studies in Denver, Los Angeles, Sweden, Finland, and a large area in the USA have found insufficient confidence in the magnetic field hypothesis, possibly because of many other physics errors; e.g., ignoring the role of vector direction, time and space averaging, not measuring any reasonable aspect of the power line electric fields and ignoring the engineering design differences in the transmission and distribution systems. The Scandinavian studies concentrated on 115 kV to 400 kV bulk transmission lines; yet, failed to consider the electric fields which induce at least ten times greater current density in a human than do the magnetic fields near the same lines. The cumulative effect of these serious errors in engineering physics is that the past decade of funded research has failed to explain why living adjacent to overhead distribution power lines in Denver and Los Angeles and living within 50 meters of bulk transmission lines in Sweden increases the risk of childhood leukemia.
电力线,癌症,还有错误的物理学
1979年在丹佛进行的一项流行病学研究发现,住在架空输电线附近的人患某些儿童癌症的风险显著增加。没有测量电量。作为一种解释,提出的假设是磁场将是致病因素,磁场可以通过计算线路上导体的数量和测量到家的距离来估计,称为“布线配置”。通过估计站在电线下面的人体内的感应电流密度,人们了解到电场必须被认为是一种可能的致病因素。在丹佛进行的后续研究未能正确测量电力线正下方的电场。定义的布线配置代码没有考虑到导体的间距或住宅相对于供电变电站的位置。布线结构(又称布线代码)估计磁场的想法是错误的。在丹佛、洛杉矶、瑞典、芬兰和美国大部分地区进行的研究发现,磁场假说的可信度不足,这可能是由于许多其他物理错误;例如,忽略矢量方向、时间和空间平均的作用,不测量电力线电场的任何合理方面,忽略输配电系统的工程设计差异。斯堪的纳维亚的研究集中在115千伏至400千伏的输电线路上;然而,没有考虑到电场在人体内产生的电流密度至少比在同一线路附近产生的磁场大十倍。工程物理学中这些严重错误的累积效应是,过去十年资助的研究未能解释为什么居住在丹佛和洛杉矶架空配电线路附近,以及居住在瑞典大型输电线路50米范围内会增加儿童白血病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信