INNOVATIVE METHOD FOR GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT IN LARGE CLASSES

S. Easa
{"title":"INNOVATIVE METHOD FOR GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT IN LARGE CLASSES","authors":"S. Easa","doi":"10.24297/IJREM.V6I3.3868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing graduate attributes in large classes is a time consuming task. The assessment requires a carefully designed random sampling that ensures the sample is representative of all students in the class. In addition, the assessment becomes more difficult when soft-skill graduate attributes are involved. The purpose of this paper is to present an efficient method for assessing graduate attributes in large classes without sampling. The proposed method involves defining an indicator (learning objective) by knowledge elements (topics) that the student should know or by interaction elements in a case study that represent the principles related to the indicator. Multiple-choice questions are then developed for the knowledge or interaction elements and processed using scantron sheets. The method involves a weighted-score procedure and performance scales for determining class performance. Application of the method for assessing two graduate attributes (lifelong learning and professionalism) in a fourth-year common engineering course is illustrated in this paper. The results show that class performance is sensitive to the weights assigned to the questions and therefore these weights should be carefully established by the instructors. The proposed method has shown to be useful in identifying the indicators and the specific topics within the indicator that need improvements.","PeriodicalId":247415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Education Methodology","volume":"60 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Education Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24297/IJREM.V6I3.3868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Assessing graduate attributes in large classes is a time consuming task. The assessment requires a carefully designed random sampling that ensures the sample is representative of all students in the class. In addition, the assessment becomes more difficult when soft-skill graduate attributes are involved. The purpose of this paper is to present an efficient method for assessing graduate attributes in large classes without sampling. The proposed method involves defining an indicator (learning objective) by knowledge elements (topics) that the student should know or by interaction elements in a case study that represent the principles related to the indicator. Multiple-choice questions are then developed for the knowledge or interaction elements and processed using scantron sheets. The method involves a weighted-score procedure and performance scales for determining class performance. Application of the method for assessing two graduate attributes (lifelong learning and professionalism) in a fourth-year common engineering course is illustrated in this paper. The results show that class performance is sensitive to the weights assigned to the questions and therefore these weights should be carefully established by the instructors. The proposed method has shown to be useful in identifying the indicators and the specific topics within the indicator that need improvements.
大班毕业生属性评价的创新方法
在大班中评估毕业生的素质是一项耗时的任务。评估需要一个精心设计的随机抽样,以确保样本是班上所有学生的代表。此外,当涉及到软技能毕业生属性时,评估变得更加困难。本文的目的是提出一种有效的方法来评估大班毕业生的属性,而不需要抽样。提出的方法包括通过学生应该知道的知识元素(主题)或案例研究中的交互元素来定义指标(学习目标),这些元素代表了与指标相关的原则。然后针对知识或交互元素开发多项选择题,并使用答题卡进行处理。该方法包括加权评分程序和用于确定班级表现的绩效量表。本文以四年制普通工程课程为例,说明了该方法在评估毕业生两项属性(终身学习和专业素养)上的应用。结果表明,课堂表现对分配给问题的权重很敏感,因此这些权重应该由教师仔细确定。所提议的方法已证明在确定指标和指标内需要改进的具体专题方面是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信