Investigation of electron-shading effects during high-current ion implants

W. Lukaszek, M.I. Current, S. Daryanani, L. Larson, T. Rhoad, J. Shields, M. Vella, D. Wagner
{"title":"Investigation of electron-shading effects during high-current ion implants","authors":"W. Lukaszek, M.I. Current, S. Daryanani, L. Larson, T. Rhoad, J. Shields, M. Vella, D. Wagner","doi":"10.1109/PPID.2003.1200952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charging characteristics of As/sup +/, BF/sub 2//sup +/, and B/sup +/ high-current ion implants, performed at different energies and different plasma flood system settings, were measured using bare and resist-covered CHARM/spl reg/-2 wafers patterned with a six-field mask containing holes ranging from 2 /spl mu/m to 0.5 /spl mu/m (clear and resist-covered fields were also used). The results show significant differences in the charging characteristics of high-current ion implanters compared to contemporary plasma-based process tools. The differences appear to be independent of ion energy, but depend on the set-up conditions of the plasma flood system used to limit positive charging caused by the ion beam. In contrast to plasma tools, the implants typically exhibited positive and negative potentials independent of hole size. The positive and negative current densities measured in the resist holes were also independent of hole size (and significantly higher than in the clear field). However, a 500 eV B/sup +/ implant with modern plasma flood control produced positive and negative potentials that scaled with hole size, as expected for electron shading, but with current densities below CHARM/spl reg/-2 detection levels. This establishes an existence proof that optimal plasma flood can achieve near perfect current balance between the positive charging from the ion beam and the negative charging from the flood plasma. Altogether, these results suggest that charging damage in high-current ion implanters should be controllable when implant mask and device features are scaled down.","PeriodicalId":196923,"journal":{"name":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPID.2003.1200952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Charging characteristics of As/sup +/, BF/sub 2//sup +/, and B/sup +/ high-current ion implants, performed at different energies and different plasma flood system settings, were measured using bare and resist-covered CHARM/spl reg/-2 wafers patterned with a six-field mask containing holes ranging from 2 /spl mu/m to 0.5 /spl mu/m (clear and resist-covered fields were also used). The results show significant differences in the charging characteristics of high-current ion implanters compared to contemporary plasma-based process tools. The differences appear to be independent of ion energy, but depend on the set-up conditions of the plasma flood system used to limit positive charging caused by the ion beam. In contrast to plasma tools, the implants typically exhibited positive and negative potentials independent of hole size. The positive and negative current densities measured in the resist holes were also independent of hole size (and significantly higher than in the clear field). However, a 500 eV B/sup +/ implant with modern plasma flood control produced positive and negative potentials that scaled with hole size, as expected for electron shading, but with current densities below CHARM/spl reg/-2 detection levels. This establishes an existence proof that optimal plasma flood can achieve near perfect current balance between the positive charging from the ion beam and the negative charging from the flood plasma. Altogether, these results suggest that charging damage in high-current ion implanters should be controllable when implant mask and device features are scaled down.
大电流离子植入过程中电子遮蔽效应的研究
在不同能量和不同等离子体流系统设置下,采用裸的和带电阻的CHARM/spl reg/-2晶片测量了As/sup +/、BF/ sup +/ /sup +/和B/sup +/大电流离子注入物的充电特性,该晶片带有六场掩模,其孔的范围从2/ spl mu/m到0.5 /spl mu/m(也使用了透明和带电阻的场)。结果表明,与当前基于等离子体的工艺工具相比,大电流离子注入器的充电特性存在显著差异。这些差异似乎与离子能量无关,但取决于用于限制离子束引起的正电荷的等离子体流系统的设置条件。与等离子工具相比,植入物通常表现出与孔尺寸无关的正负电位。在电阻孔中测量的正、负电流密度也与孔尺寸无关(并且明显高于透明场)。然而,采用现代等离子体洪水控制的500 eV B/sup +/植入物产生的正、负电位随电子遮光的孔洞尺寸而缩放,但电流密度低于CHARM/spl reg/-2检测水平。这证明了最优等离子体泛流可以在离子束的正电荷和泛流等离子体的负电荷之间达到接近完美的电流平衡。综上所述,这些结果表明,当植入膜和器件特性缩小时,大电流离子植入器的充电损伤应该是可控的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信