Automated model preprocessing for structural analysis

G. Sibenik, I. Kovacic, Valentinas Petrinas
{"title":"Automated model preprocessing for structural analysis","authors":"G. Sibenik, I. Kovacic, Valentinas Petrinas","doi":"10.22260/isarc2021/0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous modelling and structural analysis workflows reflect the heterogeneity and vague standardization in the construction industry; hence their automation is not straightforward. Procedures like redefining geometry from scratch or assigning loads one-by-one, are mostly performed manually, are time-consuming and error-prone, reflecting traditional workflows in digital BIM environments. BIM tools for structural analysis, compared to finite element method tools, aim to automate and interrelate structural design, analysis and documentation. This paper investigates the potential and obstacles for automation of structural analysis workflows. We focus on automation of model preprocessing, the procedures which interrelate structural design and analysis. Through literature review and a practical use case analysis, automatable procedures were identified and formalized. They panel discussion. The results indicate that defining floor levels, loads and load combinations, supports and joints are standard model preprocessing procedures. In special cases, e.g. special grounding conditions or heavy machinery, manual overriding of automatically assigned values might be required. Lack of clarity and traceability in the structural analysis of a complete building model, and the lack of confidence in background processes in BIM analysis tools, are identified as the main obstacles for automation. Finally,we deliver a prototype of the automated procedures with structural analysis software RFEM Dlubal, which exemplifies implementation. The automation of preprocessing is especially important for design optimization and time-dependent structural analysis during construction or demolition. This research contributes with an improvement proposal of BIM-based structural analysis thus enhancing the overall digitalization level of the building design process.","PeriodicalId":221850,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2021/0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Numerous modelling and structural analysis workflows reflect the heterogeneity and vague standardization in the construction industry; hence their automation is not straightforward. Procedures like redefining geometry from scratch or assigning loads one-by-one, are mostly performed manually, are time-consuming and error-prone, reflecting traditional workflows in digital BIM environments. BIM tools for structural analysis, compared to finite element method tools, aim to automate and interrelate structural design, analysis and documentation. This paper investigates the potential and obstacles for automation of structural analysis workflows. We focus on automation of model preprocessing, the procedures which interrelate structural design and analysis. Through literature review and a practical use case analysis, automatable procedures were identified and formalized. They panel discussion. The results indicate that defining floor levels, loads and load combinations, supports and joints are standard model preprocessing procedures. In special cases, e.g. special grounding conditions or heavy machinery, manual overriding of automatically assigned values might be required. Lack of clarity and traceability in the structural analysis of a complete building model, and the lack of confidence in background processes in BIM analysis tools, are identified as the main obstacles for automation. Finally,we deliver a prototype of the automated procedures with structural analysis software RFEM Dlubal, which exemplifies implementation. The automation of preprocessing is especially important for design optimization and time-dependent structural analysis during construction or demolition. This research contributes with an improvement proposal of BIM-based structural analysis thus enhancing the overall digitalization level of the building design process.
自动模型预处理结构分析
众多的建模和结构分析工作流程反映了建筑业的异质性和模糊的标准化;因此,它们的自动化并不简单。从头开始重新定义几何图形或逐个分配负载等过程大多是手动执行的,既耗时又容易出错,反映了数字BIM环境中的传统工作流程。与有限元方法工具相比,用于结构分析的BIM工具旨在实现结构设计、分析和文档的自动化和相互关联。本文探讨了结构分析工作流自动化的潜力和障碍。我们着重于模型预处理的自动化,这是连接结构设计和分析的程序。通过文献回顾和实际用例分析,确定并形式化了可自动化的过程。他们进行小组讨论。结果表明,确定楼板水平、荷载和荷载组合、支座和节点是标准的模型预处理程序。在特殊情况下,例如特殊接地条件或重型机械,可能需要手动重写自动指定的值。在完整建筑模型的结构分析中缺乏清晰度和可追溯性,以及对BIM分析工具中的后台流程缺乏信心,被认为是自动化的主要障碍。最后,利用结构分析软件RFEM提供了一个自动化过程的原型,并举例说明了实现过程。在施工或拆除过程中,预处理的自动化对于设计优化和随时间变化的结构分析尤为重要。本研究对基于bim的结构分析提出了改进建议,从而提高了建筑设计过程的整体数字化水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信