Comparison of power ratio and vector network analyzer techniques for measuring attenuation

C. Chirgwin, T. Crowley, W. Fang, D. LeGolvan
{"title":"Comparison of power ratio and vector network analyzer techniques for measuring attenuation","authors":"C. Chirgwin, T. Crowley, W. Fang, D. LeGolvan","doi":"10.1109/ARFTG.2012.6422438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By using a power ratio technique, we have lowered our uncertainty for attenuation measurements by a factor of about 4 (typical) when compared to our vector network analyzer uncertainty analysis. The power ratio technique is applicable to insertable 2-port devices with low reflection coefficients such as airlines and attenuators. The method is illustrated with 3 coaxial devices over a frequency range of 2-18 GHz and 2 rectangular waveguide devices over a frequency range of 50-75 GHz. Our results suggest that a significantly lower attenuation uncertainty could be justified by a re-analysis of the vector network analyzer measurements.","PeriodicalId":262198,"journal":{"name":"80th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"80th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.2012.6422438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

By using a power ratio technique, we have lowered our uncertainty for attenuation measurements by a factor of about 4 (typical) when compared to our vector network analyzer uncertainty analysis. The power ratio technique is applicable to insertable 2-port devices with low reflection coefficients such as airlines and attenuators. The method is illustrated with 3 coaxial devices over a frequency range of 2-18 GHz and 2 rectangular waveguide devices over a frequency range of 50-75 GHz. Our results suggest that a significantly lower attenuation uncertainty could be justified by a re-analysis of the vector network analyzer measurements.
功率比和矢量网络分析仪测量衰减技术的比较
通过使用功率比技术,与矢量网络分析仪的不确定度分析相比,我们将衰减测量的不确定度降低了约4倍(典型)。功率比技术适用于低反射系数的可插入双端口器件,如航空公司和衰减器。用2-18 GHz频率范围内的3个同轴器件和50-75 GHz频率范围内的2个矩形波导器件说明了该方法。我们的结果表明,通过重新分析矢量网络分析仪的测量结果,可以证明衰减不确定性明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信