An Analysis of Learners’ Perception to Synthetic Voices in Russian Language Learning

Sei Matsushita, Min Kang
{"title":"An Analysis of Learners’ Perception to Synthetic Voices in Russian Language Learning","authors":"Sei Matsushita, Min Kang","doi":"10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work-in-progress paper, we investigated differences in learners’ perception to synthetic and human voices speaking Russian to evaluate the possibility to utilize synthetic voice for learning and teaching Russian language as a foreign language (RFL). In the investigation, we conducted a word listening test. The results reveal that there is no difference between synthetic and human voices in terms of percentage of correct answers. However, there is a tendency that synthetic voice is easier for learners to recognize correctly, when specific consonants are sounded, or learners have a lower listening ability.","PeriodicalId":369501,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","volume":"4174 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work-in-progress paper, we investigated differences in learners’ perception to synthetic and human voices speaking Russian to evaluate the possibility to utilize synthetic voice for learning and teaching Russian language as a foreign language (RFL). In the investigation, we conducted a word listening test. The results reveal that there is no difference between synthetic and human voices in terms of percentage of correct answers. However, there is a tendency that synthetic voice is easier for learners to recognize correctly, when specific consonants are sounded, or learners have a lower listening ability.
俄语学习中学习者对合成语音的感知分析
在这篇正在进行中的论文中,我们研究了俄语学习者对人工语音和人声的感知差异,以评估利用人工语音学习和教学俄语作为外语(RFL)的可能性。在调查中,我们进行了一个单词听力测试。结果显示,在正确答案的百分比方面,合成声音和人类声音没有区别。然而,有一种趋势是,当特定的辅音发出时,学习者更容易正确识别合成语音,或者学习者的听力能力较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信