Sukho Lee, So-Eun Shin, J. Shon, Ji-Soong Park, In-kyun Shin, Chan-uk Jeon
{"title":"MPC model validation using reverse analysis method","authors":"Sukho Lee, So-Eun Shin, J. Shon, Ji-Soong Park, In-kyun Shin, Chan-uk Jeon","doi":"10.1117/12.2197162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It became more challenging to guarantee the overall mask Critical Dimension (CD) quality according to the increase of hot spots and assist features at leading edge devices. Therefore, mask CD correction methodology has been changing from the rule-based (and/or selective) correction to model-based MPC (Mask Process Correction) to compensate for the through-pitch linearity and hot spot CD errors. In order to improve mask quality, it is required to have accurate MPC model which properly describes current mask fabrication process. There are limits on making and defining accurate MPC model because it is hard to know the actual CD trend such as CD linearity and through-pitch owing to the process dispersion and measurement error. To mitigate such noises, we normally measure several sites of each pattern types and then utilize the mean value of each measurement for MPC modeling. Through those procedures, the noise level of mask data will be reduced but it does not always guarantee improvement of model accuracy, even though measurement overhead is increasing. Root mean square (RMS) values which is usually used for accuracy indicator after modeling actually does not give any information on accuracy of MPC model since it is only related with data noise dispersion. In this paper, we reversely approached to identify the model accuracy. We create the data regarded as actual CD trend and then create scattered data by adding controlled dispersion of denoting the process and measurement error to the data. Then we make MPC model based on the scattered data to examine how much the model is deviated from the actual CD trend, from which model accuracy can be investigated. It is believed that we can come up with appropriate method to define the reliability of MPC model developed for optimized process corrections.","PeriodicalId":308777,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Photomask Technology","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Photomask Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2197162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
It became more challenging to guarantee the overall mask Critical Dimension (CD) quality according to the increase of hot spots and assist features at leading edge devices. Therefore, mask CD correction methodology has been changing from the rule-based (and/or selective) correction to model-based MPC (Mask Process Correction) to compensate for the through-pitch linearity and hot spot CD errors. In order to improve mask quality, it is required to have accurate MPC model which properly describes current mask fabrication process. There are limits on making and defining accurate MPC model because it is hard to know the actual CD trend such as CD linearity and through-pitch owing to the process dispersion and measurement error. To mitigate such noises, we normally measure several sites of each pattern types and then utilize the mean value of each measurement for MPC modeling. Through those procedures, the noise level of mask data will be reduced but it does not always guarantee improvement of model accuracy, even though measurement overhead is increasing. Root mean square (RMS) values which is usually used for accuracy indicator after modeling actually does not give any information on accuracy of MPC model since it is only related with data noise dispersion. In this paper, we reversely approached to identify the model accuracy. We create the data regarded as actual CD trend and then create scattered data by adding controlled dispersion of denoting the process and measurement error to the data. Then we make MPC model based on the scattered data to examine how much the model is deviated from the actual CD trend, from which model accuracy can be investigated. It is believed that we can come up with appropriate method to define the reliability of MPC model developed for optimized process corrections.
随着前沿设备热点和辅助特征的增加,保证整体掩膜临界尺寸(CD)质量变得更具挑战性。因此,掩膜 CD 校正方法已从基于规则(和/或选择性)的校正转变为基于模型的 MPC(掩膜工艺校正),以补偿直通间距线性和热点 CD 误差。为了提高光罩质量,需要建立准确的 MPC 模型,以正确描述当前的光罩制造工艺。制作和定义精确的 MPC 模型有一定的局限性,因为由于工艺分散和测量误差,我们很难知道实际的 CD 趋势,如 CD 线性和通过间距。为了减少这些噪声,我们通常会对每种图案类型的多个地点进行测量,然后利用每次测量的平均值来建立 MPC 模型。通过这些步骤,掩模数据的噪声水平会降低,但这并不总能保证模型精度的提高,即使测量开销在增加。建模后通常用作精度指标的均方根(RMS)值实际上并不能提供有关 MPC 模型精度的任何信息,因为它只与数据噪声的分散性有关。在本文中,我们采用反向方法来确定模型精度。我们创建了被视为实际 CD 趋势的数据,然后通过在数据中加入表示过程和测量误差的受控离散度来创建散点数据。然后,我们根据散点数据建立 MPC 模型,检验模型与实际 CD 趋势的偏差程度,并由此考察模型的准确性。相信我们能找到合适的方法来确定为优化工艺修正而开发的 MPC 模型的可靠性。