L. Song, Y. Liang, H. Onoda, C. W. Lai, T. Wallner, A. Pofelski, C. Gruensfelder, E. Josse, T. Okawa, J. Brown, R. Williams, J. Holt, J. W. Weijtmans, B. Greene, H. Utomo, S. Lee, D. Nair, Q. Zhang, C. Zhu, X. Wu, M. Sherony, Y. Lee, W. Henson, R. Divakaruni, E. Kaste
{"title":"PMOSFET layout dependency with embedded SiGe Source/Drain at POLY and STI edge in 32/28nm CMOS technology","authors":"L. Song, Y. Liang, H. Onoda, C. W. Lai, T. Wallner, A. Pofelski, C. Gruensfelder, E. Josse, T. Okawa, J. Brown, R. Williams, J. Holt, J. W. Weijtmans, B. Greene, H. Utomo, S. Lee, D. Nair, Q. Zhang, C. Zhu, X. Wu, M. Sherony, Y. Lee, W. Henson, R. Divakaruni, E. Kaste","doi":"10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2012.6210152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eSiGe layout effect induced by PC-bounded or STI-bounded eSiGe shows impact on device performance and variability increase. For PC-bounded device, performance degradation could be explained by the mobility loss due to reducing eSiGe volume and less stress strength. For STI-bounded device, performance degradation varies, due to strong interaction between eSiGe fill morphology and device overlap capacitance. This observation was confirmed by an eSiGe fill level study. Compared to PC-bounded eSiGe, STI-bounded devices have increase variation due to eSiGe process.","PeriodicalId":388574,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Technical Program of 2012 VLSI Technology, System and Application","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Technical Program of 2012 VLSI Technology, System and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2012.6210152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The eSiGe layout effect induced by PC-bounded or STI-bounded eSiGe shows impact on device performance and variability increase. For PC-bounded device, performance degradation could be explained by the mobility loss due to reducing eSiGe volume and less stress strength. For STI-bounded device, performance degradation varies, due to strong interaction between eSiGe fill morphology and device overlap capacitance. This observation was confirmed by an eSiGe fill level study. Compared to PC-bounded eSiGe, STI-bounded devices have increase variation due to eSiGe process.