Absorber topography dependence of phase edge effects

A. Shanker, M. Sczyrba, B. Connolly, L. Waller, A. Neureuther
{"title":"Absorber topography dependence of phase edge effects","authors":"A. Shanker, M. Sczyrba, B. Connolly, L. Waller, A. Neureuther","doi":"10.1117/12.2197861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mask topography contributes to phase at the wafer plane, even for OMOG binary masks currently in use at the 22nm node in deep UV (193nm) lithography. Here, numerical experiments with rigorous FDTD simulation are used to study the impact of mask 3D effects on aerial imaging, by varying the height of the absorber stack and its sidewall angle. Using a thin mask boundary layer model to fit to rigorous simulations it is seen that increasing the absorber thickness, and hence the phase through the middle of a feature (bulk phase) monotonically changes the wafer-plane phase. Absorber height also influences best focus, revealed by an up/down shift in the Bossung plot (linewidth vs. defocus). Bossung plot tilt, however, responsible for process window variability at the wafer, is insensitive to changes in the absorber height (and hence also the bulk phase). It is seen to depend instead on EM edge diffraction from the thick mask edge (edge phase), but stays constant for variations in mask thickness within a 10% range. Both bulk phase and edge phase are also independent of sidewall angle fluctuation, which is seen to linearly affect the CD at the wafer, but does not alter wafer phase or the defocus process window. Notably, as mask topography varies, the effect of edge phase can be replicated by a thin mask model with 8nm wide boundary layers, irrespective of absorber height or sidewall angle. The conclusions are validated with measurements on phase shifting masks having different topographic parameters, confirming the strong dependence of phase variations at the wafer on bulk phase of the mask absorber.","PeriodicalId":308777,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Photomask Technology","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Photomask Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2197861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Mask topography contributes to phase at the wafer plane, even for OMOG binary masks currently in use at the 22nm node in deep UV (193nm) lithography. Here, numerical experiments with rigorous FDTD simulation are used to study the impact of mask 3D effects on aerial imaging, by varying the height of the absorber stack and its sidewall angle. Using a thin mask boundary layer model to fit to rigorous simulations it is seen that increasing the absorber thickness, and hence the phase through the middle of a feature (bulk phase) monotonically changes the wafer-plane phase. Absorber height also influences best focus, revealed by an up/down shift in the Bossung plot (linewidth vs. defocus). Bossung plot tilt, however, responsible for process window variability at the wafer, is insensitive to changes in the absorber height (and hence also the bulk phase). It is seen to depend instead on EM edge diffraction from the thick mask edge (edge phase), but stays constant for variations in mask thickness within a 10% range. Both bulk phase and edge phase are also independent of sidewall angle fluctuation, which is seen to linearly affect the CD at the wafer, but does not alter wafer phase or the defocus process window. Notably, as mask topography varies, the effect of edge phase can be replicated by a thin mask model with 8nm wide boundary layers, irrespective of absorber height or sidewall angle. The conclusions are validated with measurements on phase shifting masks having different topographic parameters, confirming the strong dependence of phase variations at the wafer on bulk phase of the mask absorber.
相位边缘效应对吸收体形貌的依赖性
掩模地形有助于晶圆平面上的相位,即使是目前在深紫外(193nm)光刻中在22nm节点上使用的OMOG二元掩模。本文采用严格的时域有限差分模拟的数值实验,通过改变吸收器堆的高度和侧壁角度,研究了掩膜三维效应对航空成像的影响。使用薄掩膜边界层模型来拟合严格的模拟,可以看到增加吸收体厚度,从而通过特征(体相)中间的相位单调地改变了晶圆面相位。吸收器高度也影响最佳聚焦,这在Bossung图(线宽与离焦)中显示为上下偏移。然而,负责晶圆上工艺窗口变化的Bossung图倾斜对吸收器高度的变化不敏感(因此也对体相不敏感)。可以看出,它取决于EM边缘衍射从厚掩膜边缘(边缘相位),但保持恒定的变化掩膜厚度在10%的范围内。体相位和边缘相位也不受边壁角波动的影响,边壁角波动会线性影响晶圆处的CD,但不会改变晶圆相位或离焦过程窗口。值得注意的是,随着掩膜形貌的变化,边缘相位的影响可以通过具有8nm宽边界层的薄掩膜模型来复制,而与吸收体高度或侧壁角无关。通过对具有不同地形参数的相移掩模的测量验证了结论,证实了晶圆上的相位变化与掩模吸收器的体相有很强的依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信